I realized I made a mistake when I tried that option before.
Now it works great. Thank you! :)
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
>
> It will be a **lot** slower.
>
>
> Pauli
> --
> Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryptio
By the way, has anyone worked on a feature or patch to use browser
provided crypto functions (WebCrypto etc.) when compiled to
pseudo-javascript via EmScripten or WebAssembly?
On 10/05/2019 07:43, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
On 10 May 2
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 10 May 2019, at 3:33 pm, Sunghyun Park wrote:
>
> Nice to meet you all :)
>
> I faced a problem while buildin
Nice to meet you all :)
I faced a problem while building assembly code in OpenSSL (e.g.,
crypto/x86_64cpuid.s) with Emscripten.
Since Emscripten does not support compilation for assembly code (As far as
I know), I'm wondering if there is any version of OpenSSL that does not
require compiling assem
There is no confirmed timeline for FIPS availability for OpenSSL 3.0. There
will never be a FIPS 1.1.1 version.
It is almost certain that there will be a gap between the end of support of
1.0.2 (end of this year) and a FIPS validated 3.0 release. If FIPS is vital
for you then there is an exte
Hi
Can you please tell me what is the plan for fips certification for
openssl1.1.1, when the fips version will be available ?
Regards
Manish
Hi Ken
I am almost struck in registering the built dll to windows 7 32 bit machine.
Can you provide me the details on which all openssl1.1.1b output lib files
and output dll files that needs to be linked to any application while
building in visual studio??
Or any steps needs to be added while b
Hi ,
The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
correctly.
openssl 1.1.0e :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes 16384 bytes
sha1 65019.16k 151552.49k 266
Hi,
Could anyone please help me wth it.
Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
sslc speed sha1
Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16858430 sha1's in 2.98s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 14147528 sha1's in 3.00s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 6436755 sha1's in 2.99s
Doing sha1
> From: vin
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Date: 05/09/2019 01:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Issue in linking Openssl1.1.1b to application
> Sent by: "openssl-users"
>
> Hi Ken
>
> Thanks for the reply.If I am not wrong ,You are asking me to set the path
of
> the dll in set path environment variable in
On 5/9/19 4:56 PM, John Unsworth wrote:
...
John.
What are you doing that is so weird?
jupiter #
jupiter # uname -a
SunOS jupiter 5.10 Generic_150400-65 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
jupiter # psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 8 virtual processors (0-7)
SPARC64-VII+ (portid 1024
Resend without cryptolist.txt and openssl_nm.txt attachments because they made
the email too big.
Attached is ar -t libcrypto.a.
sol-mds-build-01 $ ar -t libcrypto.a > cryptolist.txt
It contains stack.o which I see has the code for OPENSSL_sk_new_null.
Attached is sol-mds-build-01 $ nm openssl
> Could you please look into the program and let me know if anything I am
> doing wrong ?
> Or else What could be the issue ?
Sorry, no not me. Maybe someone else on the list has ideas.
Hi ,
I can observe slowness with standalone c programs. Attached are the sample
c programs.
If I run them with openssl 1.1.1 and 1.1.0e version on Linux system (Linux
2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 x86_64
). then I can see the difference. If I increase the number of loop in the
program, then the slowness
Hi Ken
Thanks for the reply.If I am not wrong ,You are asking me to set the path of
the dll in set path environment variable in testing machine (windows 7 32
bit) right??
But the issue is if same dll built with openssl0.9.8k is registering
properly in same test machine.
After replacing openssl l
On 5/9/2019 10:03 AM, vin wrote:
Hi
I was using an application with openssl0.9.8k .The procedure i used to link
openssl to my application using visual studio -2008 was after building
openssl i was linking libeay32.lib and ssleay32.lib to my application and
including header files from include fol
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 02:43:36PM +0300, Andrei Susnea wrote:
> Using openssl 1.0.2h I'm getting SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL while trying to
> authenticate a certificate with the following SAN names configuration:
The details of the certificate content are irrelevant. Something
else changed.
You should
So now you know where to start looking, I guess. You might also change your
test program so that it calls the functions multiple times, to “smooth out” the
overhead.
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
If we compare in quantify attached is the results.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:28 PM Salz, Rich wrote:
> I would start with doing profiling on old and new versions to see where
> the slowdown is.
>
Differences between:
program rx (pi
I would start with doing profiling on old and new versions to see where the
slowdown is.
Hi,
When we use following set of SSL methods ( openssl 1.1.1) for SHA1-digest,
we are witnessing slowness compared to openssl 1.1.0e.
EVP_get_digestbyname
EVP_MD_CTX_new
EVP_DigestInit_ex
EVP_DigestUpdate
EVP_DigestFinal_ex
Could anyone please guide me about how to debug this issue.
Thanks an
Hi
I was using an application with openssl0.9.8k .The procedure i used to link
openssl to my application using visual studio -2008 was after building
openssl i was linking libeay32.lib and ssleay32.lib to my application and
including header files from include folder.
Now with openssl1.1.1b ,after
On Thursday, 9 May 2019 13:43:36 CEST Andrei Susnea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using openssl 1.0.2h I'm getting SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL while trying to
> authenticate a certificate with the following SAN names configuration:
>
> X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
>
> DNS:.xx.xxx.xxx.xx
Hi,
Using openssl 1.0.2h I'm getting SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL while trying to
authenticate a certificate with the following SAN names configuration:
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
DNS:.xx.xxx.xxx.xxx.com,
DNS:.xx..xxx.xxx.com,
DNS:xxx-x.
This is the build line for sanity test:
rm -f test/sanitytest
${LDCMD:-cc} -xarch=v9 -xstrconst -Xa -xO5 -xdepend -m64 -xcode=pic32
-xldscope=hidden -L. -mt \
-o test/sanitytest test/sanitytest.o \
test/libtestutil.a -lcrypto -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lpthread -lrt
cc: Warning: -xarc
This looks like the problem:
ld.so.1: sanitytest: fatal: relocation error: file ../../test/sanitytest:
symbol OPENSSL_sk_new_null: referenced symbol not found
../../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../../test/sanitytest => 137
not ok 1 - running sanitytest
# Failed test 'running sanitytest'
# at
/home/me
What is the output from:
$ make V=1 TESTS=test_sanity test
Matt
On 08/05/2019 19:22, John Unsworth wrote:
> I have build OpenSSL 1.1.1b 64 bit on Solaris SunOS 5.10 Generic_Virtual sun4v
> sparc SUNW,T5140.
>
>
>
> ./Configure -lrt solaris64-sparcv9-cc no-shared -m64 -xcode=pic32
> -xldscop
27 matches
Mail list logo
