>> In a previous message, I saw:
> Does the Bind Type WEAK indicate anything?
Grasping at straws here, but I had to patch one of the assembler
files in the past on Solaris. The patch is below.
me% cd /path/to/openssl/src/crypto/bn/asm
me% patch < /tmp/sparcv9a-mont.pl.patch
Looks like
Hi, all. Thanks for your help, I could finish compilation to the end.
However, athough I successfully compiled with _no-asm_ options, I found a
problem when loading the compiled library in the 3rd party code base.
When looking into the source code, the definition of some function seems to
require a
This seems to be caused by the ongoing saga documented in issues 6912 and 8102.
These functions were declared as weak in 1.1.1b.
safestack.h
# pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_num
# pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_value
# pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_new
# pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_new_null
...
lhash.h
# pragma weak O
Hi,
I am trying to build the FIPS object module using the fips library
openssl-fips-2.0.16 on Ubuntu 18.04 for x86 arch.
I am following the steps in
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/FIPS_Library_and_Android
below steps are followed to Build the FIPS Object Module:
$ . ./setenv-android.sh
$ cd o
Hi,
On 10/05/19 02:29, ramakrushna mishra wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone please help me wth it.
Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
[...]
OpenSSL 1.1.0e 16 Feb 2017
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes
8192 bytes 16384 bytes
sha1 90515.06k 301813
On 10/05/19 03:16, ramakrushna mishra wrote:
Hi ,
The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
correctly.
openssl 1.1.0e :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes 16384 by
Dear OpenSSL Users,
At my corporate environment, I'm experience a challenge to use openssl
s_client utility. I really appreciate if someone can help me narrow down
the issue.
Here the details -
Platform: RHEL 7.x
*Openssl version:*
OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017
built on: reproducible build, d
> From: vin
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Date: 05/10/2019 12:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Issue in linking Openssl1.1.1b to application
> Sent by: "openssl-users"
>
> Hi Ken
>
> I am almost struck in registering the built dll to windows 7 32 bit
machine.
>
> Can you provide me the details on which a
Hi ,
I have installed openssl from scratch and there I am not observing any
degradation. But I built it with in my project, there I observe the
degradation. The Configure file remains same , but still in my project I
can see a difference that "dynamic-engine" is present in enabled feature
list.