Re: What's the rationale behind ssl-trace not being built by default?

2021-06-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
> On Jun 8, 2021, at 6:48 AM, Hubert Kario wrote: > > On Monday, 7 June 2021 21:01:04 CEST, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: >> The tables to convert extension IDs and compression methods to humanly >> readable names are not available outside ssl/t1_trace.c. >> >> SSL_trace() itself produces reams

Best practice for distributions that freeze OpenSSL versions and backports

2021-06-08 Thread Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
Dear team, It would be nice if there was a user- and security-friendly best practice document for distributions (such as Linux distributions) that freeze on an OpenSSL release version (such as 1.1.1z) and then backport any important fixes. Perhaps something like the following: 1. The

Re: Compile opensslß1.1.1k on CentOS8

2021-06-08 Thread Hubert Kario
On Monday, 7 June 2021 20:26:28 CEST, Lothar Belle wrote: Hi, recently I compiled openssl-1.1.1k on CentOS-8 but when I am using libcrypto.so.1.1 I get errors like: libk5crypto.so.3: undefined symbol: EVP_KDF_ctrl, version OPENSSL_1_1_1b Obviously RedHat added additional features into there

Re: What's the rationale behind ssl-trace not being built by default?

2021-06-08 Thread Hubert Kario
On Monday, 7 June 2021 21:01:04 CEST, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: The tables to convert extension IDs and compression methods to humanly readable names are not available outside ssl/t1_trace.c. SSL_trace() itself produces reams of helpful information as handshakes progress, and is particularly

Re: Openssl FIPS 186-4 Support

2021-06-08 Thread Illuri Pramod
To be more specific, Please help me point out the API, which supports *RSA 186-4 key generation*. Thanks, Pramod. On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM Illuri Pramod wrote: > Hello All, > > I am looking for options to support fips 186-4 in openssl 1.0.2. Oracle > FOM based out of fips object module

Openssl FIPS 186-4 Support

2021-06-08 Thread Illuri Pramod
Hello All, I am looking for options to support fips 186-4 in openssl 1.0.2. Oracle FOM based out of fips object module (FOM) 2.0.13, which is available in public domain, claims to have 186-4 support as per the documentation. However, I didn't find the specific diff/API, which added this support.

Checking a single signature from several in S/MIME

2021-06-08 Thread Laurent Blume via openssl-users
Hello list, I'm signing a file using SMIME with 2 signers. When trying to check the signature with only one of the two signers, it fails with a "signer certificate not found". Using both signers, it succeeds. Is there a way to be able to check the signature with a single signer, not all of

Re: Re: Compile opensslß1.1.1k on CentOS8

2021-06-08 Thread Hal Murray
janj...@nikhef.nl said: > As you found out, it is nearly impossible to swap out the existing openssl > 1.1.1g with a "stock" openssl version, as RedHat/CentOS have applied patches > to it. My advice would be: don't even try. If you *have to* use openssl > 1.1.1k, then switch to Fedora or to

Re: Compile opensslß1.1.1k on CentOS8

2021-06-08 Thread Jan Just Keijser
Hi, On 07/06/21 20:26, Lothar Belle wrote: Hi, recently I compiled openssl-1.1.1k on CentOS-8 but when I am using libcrypto.so.1.1 I get errors like: libk5crypto.so.3: undefined symbol: EVP_KDF_ctrl, version OPENSSL_1_1_1b Obviously RedHat added additional features into there own libraries,

Re: What's the rationale behind ssl-trace not being built by default?

2021-06-08 Thread Matt Caswell
On 08/06/2021 00:09, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: On Jun 7, 2021, at 4:57 PM, Matt Caswell wrote: On 07/06/2021 20:01, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: The tables to convert extension IDs and compression methods to humanly readable names are not available outside ssl/t1_trace.c. SSL_trace()