Re: RSA Security and Red Hat, Inc. Sign Licensing Agreement

1999-11-29 Thread Aaron D. Turner
After about 2 weeks worth of research (talking to this list, RSA, our lawyers, etc) I found that if your a company in the US, and you want SSL to talk to IE or Netscape, you have to either: - Break the law or - Buy a license from RSA (very expensive) or - Buy a commercial SSL implimentation

Re: What US companies need to know about RSA

1999-09-22 Thread Aaron D. Turner
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Terrell Larson wrote: Aaron, My opinion on this is as follows (I'm not a lawyer but I've hired a few for opinions). If you end up breaching the licence then RSA will have the right to revoke it from your company without compensation and secondly - they will have the

Re: What US companies need to know about RSA

1999-09-20 Thread Aaron D. Turner
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Dave Neuer wrote: -Original Message- From: Aaron D. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stunnel Maillist [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, September 17, 1999 5:43 PM Subject: What US companies need to know about RSA After

What US companies need to know about RSA

1999-09-17 Thread Aaron D. Turner
After a lot of research and talking with people from the Stunnel and OpenSSL lists, and 3 phone calls to RSA itself, I've learned far more than I ever wanted to know about RSA's patent and licensing. [Contrary to the last person who posted on this list, I found both Stunnel and OpenSSL lists