[openssl-users] CVE-2014- and OpenSSL?

2014-12-09 Thread Amarendra Godbole
So Adam Langley writes SSLv3 decoding function was used with TLS, then the POODLE attack would work, even against TLS connections. on his the latest POODLE affecting TLS 1.x. (https://www.imperialviolet.org/). I also received a notification from Symantec's DeepSight, that states: OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-users] CVE-2014- and OpenSSL?

2014-12-09 Thread Amarendra Godbole
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote: I also received a notification from Symantec's DeepSight, that states: OpenSSL CVE-2014-8730 Man In The Middle Information Disclosure Vulnerability. Did Symantic really label it an OpenSSL CVE? That's wrong. OpenSSL does

Re: CVE-2013-4353 and CVSS v2 vector with Authentication set to None

2014-01-28 Thread Amarendra Godbole
Sorry folks - I was fixated on something else to see the obvious. -Amarendra On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Amarendra Godbole amarendra.godb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am analyzing CVE-2013-4353, and the CVSS vector mentions Au parameter to N [1] From what I understand, the culprit code

CVE-2013-4353 and CVSS v2 vector with Authentication set to None

2014-01-27 Thread Amarendra Godbole
Hi, I am analyzing CVE-2013-4353, and the CVSS vector mentions Au parameter to N [1] From what I understand, the culprit code is called in the Server Finish message of the handshake, which is the last step - by this time the client has authenticated the server (step 3). So why does the CVSS

CVE-2013-4353 and CVSS v2 vector with Authentication set to None

2014-01-26 Thread Amarendra Godbole
Hi, I am analyzing CVE-2013-4353, and the CVSS vector mentions Au parameter to N [1] From what I understand, the culprit code is called in the Server Finish message of the handshake, which is the last step - by this time the client has authenticated the server (step 3). So why does the CVSS