ferences MSVCRT.DLL.
Thus in order to get things to link nicely with
OpenSSL, I recompiled OpenSSL, using /MT as well. All
seems to be working well so far in my tests, but are
there any subtle problems that this might lead to?
Many thanks.
-Bill Klein <[EMAI
Hi all,
Does anybody know where I can find the OpenSSL version
history. For example, if I wanted to know what has changed
between 0.9.5 and 0.9.5a where would I look. Can't seem to
find it on the site but I'm sure it's buried under there
somewhere. :)
Thanks!
-Bill Klein &l
t; > somewhere. :)
Alexander 'Alfe' Fetke wrote:
>i did not see any reply to the question, but i was interested in
>an answer as well. did anybody answer Bill directly, i.e. by
>skipping the mailing list?
Nope,
tuff which I call
once per thread, though I don't know if that's necessary...).
-Bill Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
outLen = KBlockSize + 8;
EVP_CipherUpdate( &context, (unsigned char*)out, &outLen, in, inLen );
output.append( out, outLen );
}
int outLen = KBlockSize + 8;
EVP_CipherFinal( &context, (unsigned char*)out, &outLen );
output.append( out, outLen );
-Bill Klein <[
ample program out there that
demonstrates this?
Thanks!
-Bill Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED
indicating readability.
- I call SSL_read() which returns -1
- I call SSL_get_error() which again returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ.
Shouldn't the return from select() have guaranteed that I
won't get another SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ spit back at me?
At 01:18 p.m. 04/11/2000, Bill Klein wrote:
&g
