Follow-up

2001-11-02 Thread George Staikos
ng something incorrectly... I don't see it though. I am calling this from C++ so I have to do lots of casting to get the function pointers to be accepted in the first call, but I'm not sure that has anything to do with it. -- George Staikos _

Re: CPS object in certificates - unsupported?

2001-07-25 Thread George Staikos
w.ibm.com and wellsfargo.com). The .der files were extracted from Netscape's cert7.db. If there are secrets in these files, then I think these guys are all in trouble because I have them too now. :) -- George Staikos

Re: CPS object in certificates - unsupported?

2001-07-25 Thread George Staikos
ARGH forgot to attach them. Here they are Untars into cert/ -- George Staikos certproblems.tgz

Re: Problem verifying certificates [was: CPS object .....]

2001-07-25 Thread George Staikos
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 05:55, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > George Staikos wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 July 2001 20:26, George Staikos wrote: > > >I've been noticing many problems with some new certificates which > > > are being issued by Entrust and Verisign.

Re: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20

2000-11-17 Thread George Staikos
On Friday 17 November 2000 17:23, Reiner Buehl wrote: > I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I > do not have a ftp site to make it available. That would be great! You could probably submit to the HP Packaging Project too -- George S

Re: Licencing issues

2000-11-13 Thread George Staikos
; > > May I dynamically link my GPL-ed application to OpenSSL? > > > > You cannot do this without a special exception, lest redistribution of > > your software will not be legal. > > Their own GnuPG is loading proprietary patent-protected modules at runtime. > Is

Re: Licencing issues

2000-11-13 Thread George Staikos
[I am not speaking for the KDE team as a whole, but for myself as author of the C++ SSL wrapper and utility classes for KDE 2.0] On Monday 13 November 2000 20:22, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > Ulf Moeller wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote: > > > (I have

Re: Licencing issues

2000-11-13 Thread George Staikos
On Monday 13 November 2000 18:35, Ulf Moeller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000, George Staikos wrote: > > (I have emails here if you need to see these) Anyhow, is there > > any chance of OpenSSL being released under GPL, or failing that, under a > > BSD style licence wi

Licencing issues

2000-11-13 Thread George Staikos
licencing, so please excuse my ignorance. And don't shoot the messenger... :) Thanks -- George Staikos __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: followup to problem I posted

2000-10-05 Thread George Staikos
lier on. Bingo... There is an expired file in there. I guess it really should get moved to the expired/ directory :) Thanks! -- George Staikos __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openss

Re: followup to problem I posted

2000-10-05 Thread George Staikos
On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 10:16:58AM -0400, George Staikos wrote: > > I have found that using a .crt bundle instead of a hashed directory works. > > Perhaps is this code broken in 0.9.6? > > What do you mean by "broken"?

followup to problem I posted

2000-10-05 Thread George Staikos
I have found that using a .crt bundle instead of a hashed directory works. Perhaps is this code broken in 0.9.6? -- George Staikos __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support