Hi, Richard...
I'm not going to place my reply after Jakob's, as his makes a number of
excellent points, with many of which I wholeheartedly agree (I'm not big
on DKIM and DMARC, myself). However, a few points specific to the case
at hand, if I may:
Richard Levitte wrote:
Hi all,
It seem
On 07/10/2015 09:32 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 10/07/15 13:09, R C Delgado wrote:
Hello,
With regards to CVE-2015-1793, I've seen the example in verify_extra_test.c.
How deep does the certificate chain have to be?
If I have 2 self-signed CA certificates, and a non-CA certificate is
received
Hi, all...
I think it wise to go back to the OP's stated objective, to create an
independent to libraries source code for demonstration purposes for
AES-CTR mode. The operative prepositional phrase here being for
demonstration purposes.
Thus, whether it is wise to implement one's own crypto
On 01/12/2015 06:57 AM, Gabriel Marques wrote:
For all the openssl list subscribers:
The openssl-announce is a standard e-mail list based on MailMan. So to
unsubscribe just access
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/options/openssl-announce
And follow the un-subscription instructions - no need to
Hi, Akash...
On 10/08/2014 01:40 AM, Akash Jain wrote:
HI,
How can I know the Extended Key Usage parameters of a remote SSL
enabled site using OpenSSL ?
Does this help:
https://www.madboa.com/geek/openssl/#cert-retrieve
You could modify the one script there to something like:
#!/bin/sh
-showcerts -connect google.com:443
http://google.com:443 /dev/null | openssl x509 -outform PEM |
openssl x509 -noout -text | grep -A1 X509v3 Extended Key Usage
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Lewis Rosenthal
lgrosent...@2rosenthals.com mailto:lgrosent...@2rosenthals.com
wrote:
Hi, Akash
Hi, Aaron...
On 09/19/2014 01:04 PM, Stromas, Aaron wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking for help with a problem I've ran into a using
mod_proxy/mod_ssl. The Apache HTTP server on SLES 11 SP3 64 bit,
OpenSSL 1.0.1.f acts as SSL proxy to the Weblogic 10.3 running on
Redhat. The mod_ssl is
Hi, Tim...
On 09/01/2014 04:45 PM, Tim Hudson wrote:
On 31/08/2014 3:02 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
Rich, what needs to be done to see that OS/2 does not get removed from HEAD?
Can someone provide an OS/2 build environment for team members?
Well, that's kind of a loaded question, but here
