That is nice to know. Thank you! That fixed my problem.
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:36:01AM -0600, Mike Brennan wrote:
>
> > It seems that Openssl doesn't always obey the server's priority
>
> s/doesn't always obey/never by default obeys/
>
Greetings,
It seems that Openssl doesn't always obey the server's priority
ordered list of ciphers (set with SSL_set_cipher_list()), even when
that list is syntactically correct, when the ciphers are available,
and when the client capabilities don't constrain the choice.
Example: I can specify o
> I'm just curious, what was the offending library? I have seen similar memory
> issues \
> in the past that I never had a chance to get to the bottom of, actually
> openssl \
> behaved differently between 0.9.8i and 0.9.8j. But I'm wondering what
> library you \
> had to work around.
It was
>
> Tim Hudson wrote:
>
> > Can you make a small test program which demonstrates this behaviour?
>
> > Typically some cleanup code is being missed when this is sort of thing is
> > raised; however a bit of test code makes it fairly easy to track down
> using a
> > combination of the m
Tim Hudson wrote:
> Can you make a small test program which demonstrates this behaviour?
> Typically some cleanup code is being missed when this is sort of thing is
> raised; however a bit of test code makes it fairly easy to track down using
a
> combination of the malloc wrapper func
