2.13 due to constraints
with the Busybox version I am using.
Thanks for the help and suggestions.
Mike
On 2/18/2015 8:03 AM, Mike Collins wrote:
My build script is doing the same.
Not sure where to go next except to update libc to a newer version. Due to
the toolchain (not created by me) it
: [openssl-users] 1.0.1 upgrade issue
I'm building against libc6 (glibc 2.9) and kernel 3.2.6. Are you skipping
the 'make depend' step? My build script does, './Configure ', 'make
depend', 'make'.
Jay
On 2/18/2015 8:03 AM, Mike Collins wrote:
Th
ch can cause OpenSSL to be built against the (old)
headers in your tool chain, rather than it's local (current) headers.
I did discover that with 1.0.2, I also needed to add
'-DOPENSSL_USE_BUILD_DATE' to the CFLAGS to get the 'openssl version -a'
command to report a useful b
I am upgrading an embedded linux board's BSP from 1.0.0m to 1.0.1l due to a
requirement for TLS v1.1. Version 1.0.1 will cross compile without errors
using my 1.0.0 configuration but I have identified the following errors on
the board (so far) with the build using 1.0.1:
1.) Cannot create a RSA key
