Re: Problems building openssl 0.9.3a on Solaris 2.5.1 (and also NetBSD 1.3.3 x86)

.9.3a on Solaris 2.5.1 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Moeller) > > Date: 1999-07-03 17:27:45 > > [Download message RAW] > > > > Sarah Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > /tmp/openssl/openssl-0.9.3a > make > > [...] > >

Problems building openssl 0.9.3a on Solaris 2.5.1

c I have looked in the archives and cannot find anything that appears to relate to this. Does anybody have any ideas? [0.9.2b builds with no problems whatsoever] cheers, Sarah -- Have you seen the fnords? Sarah Bateman([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Interesting Handshake behaviour

broken (as suggested). Dealing with a new ssl library is simpler to sort out than working around this problem in 0.8.1. thanks again Sarah PS. I've tested against 0.9.2.b instead of 0.9.3.b due to problem with building on solaris 2.5.1, but that's another problem ;-) -- Have you se

Re: Interesting Handshake behaviour

; 5 (0x5)) - 15 03 00 00 02. read from 001281E8 [0012FB65] (2 bytes => 2 (0x2)) - 02 2f ./ 28537:error:14094417:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert illegal parameter:s3_pkt.c:761 28537:error:1

Implementing non-chaining in SSLeay

, Sarah -- Have you seen the fnords? Sarah Bateman([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Software Engineer Client Integration Development, SCO, Vision Park, Cambridge __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

Re: y2k

eers, Sarah -- Have you seen the fnords? Sarah Bateman([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Software Engineer Client Integration Development, SCO, Vision Park, Cambridge, UK __ OpenSSL Project http://www.op