I don't think that's possible at the moment. There are no
deterministically built operating systems yet.
This is rather sad. I think FreeBSD has
a project somewhere trying to move that way.
Hopefully all of the unix-likes are at least aware of
the concept, if not having an actual project for
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:38 AM, rw...@countermail.com wrote:
Hello,
can BitMail.sf.net as a p2p email tool for encrypted Email (and hybrid with
IMAP-Email) be regarded as a reference model for research to create a secure
Email Client? as it uses both, gnupg and openssl!
Since OpenSSL 0.9.8 is still in widespread use it will still be
maintained for some time yet.
I think part of this is may due to the new 1.x.x releases not
being able to compile on older releases of operating systems.
Perhaps a short round of effort in resolving that would allow
people to move
Translation: I have to agree with O.P. - It looks broke to me too. ;-)
Heh, that's precisely what I said in my report :) The front end
options to do it seem to exist, and they even have some brief
descriptions as such. They just don't work :)
'zlib' should get us static inclusion.
1. Make sure there is a libz.a in /lib or /usr/lib, otherwise you have no
static zlib to link in.
Of course there's an old libz.a there. And it should not matter as
we're given the --with-zlib arguments to point the build elsewhere
for those libraries. And as seen in the report, it is following
I have a case that needs zlib statically in openssl.
But I can't seem to make that. Only dynamic is made.
For testing I put zlib125 in its own dir.
Then for openssl...
./config
--prefix=path
--with-zlib-include=dir/include
--with-zlib-lib=dir/lib
shared
zlib
make
make install
This gives...
Hello.
How can I verify and test that a given openssl binary
installation supports zlib compression?
Can I simply [un]compress a file with openssl and
do the reverse with gzip as a command line test?
s_client and s_server?
Are the zlib and zlib-dynamic options intended to be
exclusive?
Or is
Does OpenSSL make specific use of either of these CPU features?
And what functions or algorithms of OpenSSL would benefit?
My use case is primarily AES as commonly used with disk encryption
but not limited to that.
Unrelated to OpenSSL would be whether the kernel crypto(4|9)
frameworks of things
hi. three related questions...
1) How does one compile with libz.a?
2) How does one compile with a specific zlib?
3) How does one compile a fully static openssl?
i will gladly test and post confirmation of solutions. thx.
Regarding #1 ...
INSTALL says the following:
no-zlib Don't try
