Hi,
Thanks for all the information related to missing rc4 assembly file for
IA-64 architecture.
*Richard : * The following mentioned degradation on nt64 compared to the
same openssl version 1.1.1 build with out using the flags "
"enable-weak-ssl-ciphers" and "
enable-deprecated" .
Thanks and Re
Hi,
In Openssl 1.1.1, the file "rc4-ia64.pl" is missing. This cause
degradation of performance on AIX. Is this intentional for deprecating the
support for RC4 ?
Similarly If I build Openssl 1.1.1 on nt64 with flags
"*enable-weak-ssl-ciphers"
and "**enable-deprecated" , *I witness degrade in p
Hi,
I am building openssl 1.1.1 on windows with 2 different configurations and
I see performance difference for des-cbc.
1) *"perl Configure VC-WIN64A enable-weak-ssl-ciphers enable-rc4
enable-deprecated no-shared enable-ssl3 no-asm --prefix=
--openssldir= " *
The speed test results for des-cbc w
gards,
Ram Krushna
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:46 AM ramakrushna mishra
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
> correctly.
>
> openssl 1.1.0e :
> The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
> type
48496.92k
49381.38k51755.48k
could any one please confirm if my interpretation is correct ?
I doubt any issue with openssl 1.1.1 version with such wider user base.
How to debug this further ?
Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:59 AM ramakrushna mishra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Could anyone please help me wth it.
Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
sslc speed sha1
Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16858430 sha1's in 2.98s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 14147528 sha1's in 3.00s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 6436755 sha1's in 2.99s
Doing sha1
Hi ,
I can observe slowness with standalone c programs. Attached are the sample
c programs.
If I run them with openssl 1.1.1 and 1.1.0e version on Linux system (Linux
2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 x86_64
). then I can see the difference. If I increase the number of loop in the
program, then the slowness
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
If we compare in quantify attached is the results.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:28 PM Salz, Rich wrote:
> I would start with doing profiling on old and new versions to see where
> the slowdown is.
>
Differences between:
program rx (pi
Hi,
When we use following set of SSL methods ( openssl 1.1.1) for SHA1-digest,
we are witnessing slowness compared to openssl 1.1.0e.
EVP_get_digestbyname
EVP_MD_CTX_new
EVP_DigestInit_ex
EVP_DigestUpdate
EVP_DigestFinal_ex
Could anyone please guide me about how to debug this issue.
Thanks an
so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of openssl-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: SSL_read() returning SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL with errno 11
> EAGAIN (John Unsworth)
>2. Reg Change in Error Code (ramakrushna mishra)
>3. Re:
Hi,
When client(openssl) is configured with TLSv1 and Server(java) was
configured with TLSv1_2, then in openssl version 1.1.0e we used to get the
error code : 337002677( 0x141640B5). But with openssl 1.1.1 upgrade the
error code changed to 337285301
(0x141A90B5). Moreover Earlier in java also we u
Hi,
Could anyone please help me get the following information.
-- How to verify that the openssl is using the assembly code ( when asm is
enabled) instead of the c code for the algorithms ?
-- I m observing a small degradation (2 % for 16 byte size) for des-ede3 on
openssl1.1.1 for Solaris. This
l, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openssl-users-requ...@openssl.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openssl-users-ow...@openssl.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than &quo
>
> Hi All,
>
Thanks for your responses.
I am able to build openssl 1.1.1 on my solaris and able to run "openssl
version".
I followed the same procedure for openssl 1.1.1b and when I run "openssl
version" seeing the mentioned error. i.e
"ld.so.1: openssl: fatal: relocation error: file openssl: sy
Hi All,
Thanks for all your response.
I have tried to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the lib path of newly installed
openssl and still "./openssl version" fails with the same reason.
There is another suggestion to "compile with a RUNPATH set in the
output ELF files. " . Could anyone please provide more
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade openssl on solaris machine from 1.1.0e to 1.1.1b.
The "uname -a " output from solaris is :
> SunOS 5.10 Generic_147147-26 sun4v sparc sun4v
>
The Configure and installation of openssl was successful.
But when i run "bin/openssl version" it fails with following error.
ECIES in 1.1.1 (Matt Caswell)
>4. openssl cms encrypt recipientInfo [questions for openssl
> developers]. ( ?)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:57:04 +0100
> From: Matt Caswell
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Reg issue in ale
Hi All,
Thank you for all for providing the information.
I suspect we are using " SSL_MODE_SEND_FALLBACK_SCSV " and that might be
causing the issue. The team is looking into this issue now with the
provided information.
One doubt that came during our investigation is :
" If client has highest
hen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of openssl-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: What to do with deprecation errors (Salz, Rich)
>2. Re: What to do with deprecation errors (Matt Caswell)
>
Hi,
I am facing an issue after openssl upgrade to 1.1.1.
I have a odbc client with maximum version support up to TLSv1.2 and my
database is running with TLSv1.2,TLsv1.3.
The handhake is failing and I am getting following contents on my BIO dump.
"15 03 03 00 02 02 56" .
If i have understood corr
20 matches
Mail list logo
