Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"

2015-06-12 Thread Salz, Rich
> $ tar zxf openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz > tar: A lone zero block at 46120 Perhaps this? http://askubuntu.com/questions/169223/tar-a-lone-zero-block-at-343398 ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-use

Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"

2015-06-12 Thread Kevin Layer
avery.a.tara...@securityengineer.pro wrote: >> Was the md5 hash of the archive matching the one on openssl >> website? Yes. It matches. $ tar zxf openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz tar: A lone zero block at 46120 ~ $ md5sum openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz 139568bd5a56fa49b72a290d37113f30 *openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz ~ $

Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"

2015-06-12 Thread avery . a . tarasov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Was the md5 hash of the archive matching the one on openssl website? On Fri, Jun 12 at 06:49 PM (UTC), "Kevin Layer" wrote: > It seems to build fine, though. > > I downloaded it via different means (directly to a Windows > machine and > on CentOS 6.

[openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"

2015-06-12 Thread Kevin Layer
It seems to build fine, though. I downloaded it via different means (directly to a Windows machine and on CentOS 6.6) and it did it on all copies. Just curious if anyone else had the issue. I'm running Cygwin 1.7.35 on Server 2008 R2. ___ openssl-user