Re: [openssl-users] Differences in openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x for private pem key file

2014-12-30 Thread Jaya Nageswar
Hi Dave, Thank you very much for a prompt response. I very much appreciate your inputs. I have a couple of follow up questions. You mentioned that the output would be different between openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x versions as the following methods are being used in the code flow for the method

Re: [openssl-users] Differences in openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x for private pem key file

2014-12-30 Thread Dave Thompson
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Jaya Nageswar Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 02:36 ... the output [is] different between openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x versions as the following methods are being used in the code flow for the method PEM_write_bio_PrivateKey. 1.0.1x -

[openssl-users] Differences in openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x for private pem key file

2014-12-22 Thread Jaya Nageswar
Dear openssl community, In our application, we have been using openssl 0.9.8 and trying to move to openssl 1.0.1x as 0.9.8 is going to be EOS by December 2015. We have a sample application where we try to read a sample pem key file, create an EVP_PKEY indirectly using

Re: [openssl-users] Differences in openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x for private pem key file

2014-12-22 Thread Dave Thompson
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Jaya Nageswar Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 05:51 In our application, we have been using openssl 0.9.8 and trying to move to openssl 1.0.1x as 0.9.8 is going to be EOS by December 2015. We have a sample application where we try to read a sample pem key

Re: [openssl-users] Differences in openssl 0.9.8 and 1.0.1x for private pem key file

2014-12-22 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 22/12/2014 13:57, Dave Thompson wrote: At least for now; there is another thread started just a few days ago about all PEM formats used by OpenSSL suggesting the traditional privatekey forms are obsolete and maybe should be deleted! Please don't do that until 5+ years after 0.9.8