On 05/11/2018 07:20, Thulasi Goriparthi wrote:
For such tests, it's always better safe than sorry.
Not sure, if repeating the same test (or the test of the same value)
would add any safety.
The safety is in avoiding creating some situation where its tested
zero times because each test
>> For such tests, it's always better safe than sorry.
Not sure, if repeating the same test (or the test of the same value)
would add any safety.
Thanks,
Thulasi.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 16:53, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
wrote:
>
> On 02/11/2018 08:50, Thulasi Goriparthi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
On 02/11/2018 08:50, Thulasi Goriparthi wrote:
Hi,
I am going through the checks done by EC_KEY_check_key method. I see
the following checks in order.
1. Is point at infinity? - reject.
2. Is point not on curve? reject.
3. Is point not in the primary subgroup? reject.
4. If priv key(scalar)
Hi,
I am going through the checks done by EC_KEY_check_key method. I see
the following checks in order.
1. Is point at infinity? - reject.
2. Is point not on curve? reject.
3. Is point not in the primary subgroup? reject.
4. If priv key(scalar) available, then check if scalar * G != point.
If
