[openssl-users] SMIME: 1.0.0e vs. 1.0.1e

2016-02-18 Thread c.hol...@ades.at
Hello! I have a little problem with an update from an old 1.0.0e (vanilla compiled) vs. debians (7.9, stable) 1.0.1e. I try to verify an smime-signature Tried with the same smime-file and with the same certificates on the same machine. The certificates are fine and are ok if I verify them.

[openssl-users] SMIME: 1.0.0e vs. 1.0.1e

2016-02-18 Thread c.hol...@ades.at
I'd like to add the following to my thread. - If I use option -nosigs then it is working. But sure its not verifying. If I change the content it is still ok with this option in place. - I tried also the current 1.0.1r and get the same behaviour with 1.0.1e. - Option -binary does not help. Th

[openssl-users] SMIME: 1.0.0e vs. 1.0.1e

2016-02-26 Thread c.hol...@ades.at
Hi! I'd like to finish the thread I started. - My first statement was wrong. Also 1.0.0e is not able to process my SMIME-sample. The reason was that I had a smime-binary-patch installed at the 1.0.0e some years ago and I did not remember about it. Without the patch installed in the 1.0.1e it l

Re: [openssl-users] SMIME: 1.0.0e vs. 1.0.1e

2016-02-18 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, c.hol...@ades.at wrote: > I'd like to add the following to my thread. > > - If I use option -nosigs then it is working. > But sure its not verifying. If I change the content it is still ok > with this option in place. > > - I tried also the current 1.0.1r and get the same b