On 11 mai 2015, at 07:45, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:24:10AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>
>> I've compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2a on Mac OS X 10.6.8, and used `openssl
>> speed` to compare performances with stock OpenSSL (0.9.8). In many
>> tests, 1.0.2a is a bit faster, o
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:24:10AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> I've compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2a on Mac OS X 10.6.8, and used `openssl
> speed` to compare performances with stock OpenSSL (0.9.8). In many
> tests, 1.0.2a is a bit faster, or as fast as 0.9.8y, but on the 6
> AES tests, the old one
Hello,
I've compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2a on Mac OS X 10.6.8, and used `openssl speed` to
compare performances with stock OpenSSL (0.9.8). In many tests, 1.0.2a is a bit
faster, or as fast as 0.9.8y, but on the 6 AES tests, the old one is almost
twice as fast as the new one:
OpenSSL 1.0.2a 19 Mar 20
