Re: Cryptographic Hardware Accelerators for OpenSSL

2006-02-16 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006, Randy Turner wrote: > > I'm assuming it's also possible to statically link/bind (at build > time) engine drivers. Is this the case? > Yes. An application then would need to make an explicit call to the static engine code to either reference it explicitly or register it.

Re: Cryptographic Hardware Accelerators for OpenSSL

2006-02-16 Thread Randy Turner
I'm assuming it's also possible to statically link/bind (at build time) engine drivers. Is this the case? R. On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2006, Lech Olmedo wrote: My intent is trying to add as a new Engine some crypto modules from a Coldfire dev

Re: Cryptographic Hardware Accelerators for OpenSSL

2006-02-16 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006, Lech Olmedo wrote: > > My intent is trying to add as a new Engine some crypto modules from a > Coldfire device..., but after reading some information and some links, it > seem that it is not possible... is this correct? > I'm not sure what would make you think it isn't pos

Cryptographic Hardware Accelerators for OpenSSL

2006-02-16 Thread Lech Olmedo
Is it possible to add a new Hardware Accelerator beside those that are already supported as an Engine object in the OpenSSL implementation? My intent is trying to add as a new Engine some crypto modules from a Coldfire device..., but after reading some information and some links, it seem that it i