RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-20 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew T. Finnell wrote: > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client > applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is > receiving duplic

RE: Duplicate Posts (Still)

2002-03-20 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Paulo Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts (Still) > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > rse> Just to make su

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Allan E Johannesen
> "Lutz.Jaenicke" == Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lutz.Jaenicke> I am not familiar with SMTPfeed, but I am quite familiar with Lutz.Jaenicke> postfix :-) The message above means, that the mail body was sent Lutz.Jaenicke> out successfully. According to RFC821, the body is finishe

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > | Mar 18 10:27:36 postfix/lmtp[83321]: 57F961950B: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > | relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=863, status=deferred (conversation with > | 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while sending end of data -- message m

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > As you can see, SMTPfeed (the LMTP service reported here by Postfix) on > mmx.engelschall.com tried many times to deliver the message because the > connection timed out in the middle of the SMTP conversation. And, yes, > as the log also says, the result could be that

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > ... According to the Postfix logfile for this particular mail and > the receiving MTA, it is the problem of the receiving MTA or the network > connection to it: There you have it, Ralf -- the problem is with Postfix itself. Other mailing lists don't have this probl

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lance Nehring
100 (MET) > Received: from sbox.tugraz.at ([212.186.199.33]) by viefep16-int.chello.at > (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with ESMTP > id > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:11:37 +0100 > M

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002, Lance Nehring wrote: > Yes, I see the same thing in my headers. > I've also addressed this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to try to get > their attention to investigate their email logs. > A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin. > per RFC822. >

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Wojcik
IL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts > > > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client > applications. Why n

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Roger F. Borrello, Jr.
ent's everyone is using that is |receiving duplicate posts? If they are all the same then it's a safe bet |it's the client. I am subscribed multiple times under different accounts |and have never received duplicate posts and I use Outlook XP. | |- |Andrew T. Finnell |Active Solutions L.L

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Oscar Valenzuela
    Subject:        RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client applications.  Why not post the client's everyone is using that is receiving duplicate posts? If they are all the same then

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ales Privetivy
-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do > with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client > applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is > receiving duplicate posts? If they

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
Microsoft Outlook 2000 / Windows 2000 Emanuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew T. Finnell Sent: 18 martie 2002 15:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't thi

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread jirak
Lotus Notes 4.6.1 "Andrew T. Finnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/18/2002 08:51:20 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Joel Jirak/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don'

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Andrew T. Finnell
See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is receiving duplicate posts? If they are all the same then it's a safe bet it

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
I have the same problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvanen Sent: 18 martie 2002 10:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts "Roger F. Borrello, Jr." wrote: > > Am I the only one getting 4 or 5

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Aarno Syvänen
"Roger F. Borrello, Jr." wrote: > > Am I the only one getting 4 or 5 copies of posted messages? No, I have the same problem. Aarno __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing L