Hi
Upgrading our code to openssl 3.0. the below function we trying to replace
ENGINE_load_dynamic()
Replacment for 3.0 what i found
OPENSSL_init_crypto(OPENSSL_INIT_ENGINE_DYNAMIC, NULL)
ENGINE_by_id("dynamic")
ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string()
ENGINE_set_default()
ENGINE_get_DH()
ENGINE_free()
Nee
Hello,
there is no direct replacement. The ENGINEs as a pluggable crypto
modules concept is replaced with the providers concept which is much
more sophisticated and capable.
Please look at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/migration_guide.html
ENGINEs support is not removed from OpenSSL 3
: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
Hello,
there is no direct replacement. The ENGINEs as a pluggable crypto
modules concept is replaced with the providers concept which is much
more sophisticated and capable.
Please look at
https://clicktime.symantec.com/3NTnN1ZFia2bCryEiZnkRmY6H2
he
> providers
>
> Thanks,
> shiva kumar
> From: Tomas Mraz
> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 7:00 PM
> To: Shivakumar Poojari ;
> openssl-users@openssl.org
> Cc: Paramashivaiah, Sunil ;
> Bhattacharjee, Debapriyo (c)
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API rep
kumar Poojari ; openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: Paramashivaiah, Sunil ; Bhattacharjee,
Debapriyo (c)
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
I am sorry but as I said providers are not a direct replacement for ENGINEs. It
is a completely different implementation of the
priyo
(c)
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
I am sorry but as I said providers are not a direct replacement for ENGINEs. It
is a completely different implementation of the same concept of pluggable
cryptographical modules for OpenSSL. You can look at the OpenSSL m
sday, September 15, 2021 2:18 PM
>> To: Shivakumar Poojari ;
>> openssl-users@openssl.org
>> Cc: Paramashivaiah, Sunil ; Bhattacharjee,
>> Debapriyo (c)
>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
>>
>> I am sorry but as I said providers are no
ject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
I am sorry but as I said providers are not a direct replacement for ENGINEs. It
is a completely different implementation of the same concept of pluggable
cryptographical modules for OpenSSL. You can look at the OpenSSL manual pag
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 2:18 PM
To: Shivakumar
Poojari;openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: Paramashivaiah, Sunil;
Bhattacharjee, Debapriyo (c)
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0
I am sorry but as I said providers are not a direct replacement for
EN
t;> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/providers/legacyprov.c
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> On 15/09/2021 13:26, Petr Gotthard wrote:
>>>>> Shiva,
>>>>> you may also have a look at
>>>>> thehttps://gith
10 matches
Mail list logo
