Re: OpenSSL 1.0.1e build failure using MinGW, multiple definition of OPENSSL_Uplink [SOLVED?]

2013-09-17 Thread Thomas J Pinkl
On 09/13/2013 04:08 AM, Carl Young wrote: Forgive me if I am wrong, but I didn't think the FIPS 2.0 code base > could be used with anything else but MS VC on Windows!? The user guide does not state this explicitly as far as I can see, but the instructions - for building the canister and linkin

RE: OpenSSL 1.0.1e build failure using MinGW, multiple definition of OPENSSL_Uplink

2013-09-13 Thread Carl Young
sl-us...@openssl.org] on behalf of Thomas J Pinkl [t...@pinkl.com] Sent: 11 September 2013 15:50 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1e build failure using MinGW, multiple definition of OPENSSL_Uplink I'm trying to build a FIPS capable OpenSSL 1.0.1e on a 32-bit Windows XP box u

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.1e build failure using MinGW, multiple definition of OPENSSL_Uplink

2013-09-12 Thread Thomas J Pinkl
I'm re-posting this, as I'm still looking for a solution. Another user has confirmed that they have the same failure with OpenSSL + FIPS on 32-bit windows, though it works for them on 64-bit. Any help would be greatly appreciated. On 09/11/2013 10:50 AM, Thomas J Pinkl wrote: I'm trying to

OpenSSL 1.0.1e build failure using MinGW, multiple definition of OPENSSL_Uplink

2013-09-11 Thread Thomas J Pinkl
I'm trying to build a FIPS capable OpenSSL 1.0.1e on a 32-bit Windows XP box using MinGW + Msys. The FIPS module is version 2.0.5 and it builds and installs successfully using ./config; make; make install. I configured OpenSSL 1.0.1e with: ./Configure mingw shared fips And ran: make dep