Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-17 Thread Dennis Clarke via openssl-users
On 5/16/24 08:28, Neil Horman wrote: Glad its working a bit better for you. If you are inclined, please feel free to open a PR with your changes for review. Well, the changes are *really* trivial. Necessary and trivial. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-16 Thread Neil Horman
Glad its working a bit better for you. If you are inclined, please feel free to open a PR with your changes for review. Best Neil On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:40 AM Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 5/15/24 18:34, Neil Horman wrote: > > You are correct, the files you reference (most of them in fact)

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-16 Thread Dennis Clarke via openssl-users
On 5/15/24 18:34, Neil Horman wrote: You are correct, the files you reference (most of them in fact) get built into separate objects in the event the build flags are different for shared and static libraries, and should be unrelated to the issue you are seeing I was somewhat puzzled by

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-15 Thread Neil Horman
You are correct, the files you reference (most of them in fact) get built into separate objects in the event the build flags are different for shared and static libraries, and should be unrelated to the issue you are seeing As for the undefined symbols, thats definitely a mystery. most notably,

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-15 Thread Dennis Clarke via openssl-users
On 5/13/24 03:34, Matt Caswell wrote: On 13/05/2024 02:42, Neil Horman wrote: We added support for RCU locks in 3.3 which required the use of atomics (or emulated atomic where they couldn't be supported), but those were in libcrypro not liberal Right - its supposed to fallback to

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-13 Thread Matt Caswell
On 13/05/2024 02:42, Neil Horman wrote: We added support for RCU locks in 3.3 which required the use of atomics (or emulated atomic where they couldn't be supported), but those were in libcrypro not liberal Right - its supposed to fallback to emulated atomic calls where atomics aren't

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-12 Thread Dennis Clarke via openssl-users
On 5/12/24 21:42, Neil Horman wrote: We added support for RCU locks in 3.3 which required the use of atomics (or emulated atomic where they couldn't be supported), but those were in libcrypro not liberal I see. I am having great difficulty with 3.3 on an old Sun SPARC64 server where there

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-12 Thread Neil Horman
We added support for RCU locks in 3.3 which required the use of atomics (or emulated atomic where they couldn't be supported), but those were in libcrypro not liberal On Sun, May 12, 2024, 7:26 PM Dennis Clarke via openssl-users < openssl-users@openssl.org> wrote: > > On 4/9/24 08:56, OpenSSL

Re: OpenSSL version 3.3.0 published

2024-05-12 Thread Dennis Clarke via openssl-users
On 4/9/24 08:56, OpenSSL wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenSSL version 3.3.0 released == Trying to compile this on an old Solaris 10 machine and over and over and over I see these strange things as Undefined symbols :