Diarmuid Oneill wrote:
> I have found out that the 0.9.6 distributions of OSSL do not include
> Itanium assembly implementations for much (maybe any Itanium assembly
> at all, I didn't look) of the CPU intensive operations, including
> RSA/ModExp. So OSSL uses the C routines which are, to say the
Sorry should have had subject Re OpenSSL on itanium
Hi,
I have done a bit of research into this topic and some of my findings directly oppose what was said about the itanium not matching the P3 Mhz to Mhz.
I have found out that the 0.9.6 distributions of OSSL do not include Itanium assembly
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, chirs charter wrote:
> Nice observations. The alpha is gone now? When did DEC
> discontinue it?
DEC was discontinued. Its corpse was dismembered and sold to various
companies, and Compaq got most of the silicon designs (including the aXp
and the DS21x4x "Tulip" Ethernet chip
[ I guess we're getting off-topic here. I'll make one more go of it for
"informational purposes" (I have a EE and worked at an IC design firm
for 2 years), but let's take it _off-list_ after this. Please reply
off-list. ]
chirs charter wrote:
> Nice observations. The alpha is gone now?
Basical
m. 0.35um is older technology.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of chirs charter
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2001 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL on itanium
Nice observations. The alpha is gone now? Wh
Nice observations. The alpha is gone now? When did DEC
discontinue it? Lastly in the measurement what does
"um" stand for? Thanks
--- Bryan-TheBS-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diarmuid Oneill wrote:
> > When I download and build OpenSSL (which works
> fine!) and run the
> > openssl speed rsa
