unsubscribe openssl-users
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Leonardo Laface de Almeida
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 5:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RES: Openssl versions compability
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] Em
nome de Ken Goldman
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2013 13:13
Para: openssl-users@openssl.org
Assunto: Re: Openssl versions compability
On 1/23/2013 9:51 AM, Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:12:36AM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote:
> On 1/23/2013 9:51 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >Binary compatibility can be tricky, and it brings up all the old
> >wounds of Microsoft's COM. Are you claiming there is binary
> >compatibility among tool vendors? For example, can I buil
On 1/23/2013 9:51 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Binary compatibility can be tricky, and it brings up all the old
wounds of Microsoft's COM. Are you claiming there is binary
compatibility among tool vendors? For example, can I build the base
with GCC, and then build patches with ICC? How about differe
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:51:08AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Binary compatibility can be tricky, and it brings up all the old
> wounds of Microsoft's COM. Are you claiming there is binary
> compatibility among tool vendors? For example, can I build the base
> with GCC, and then build patches
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:12:41AM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote:
>
>> My experience is that you should not expect binary compatibility.
>> Since errors will often be in little used corner cases, it's safer
>> to always recompile.
>
> Please do
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:12:41AM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote:
> My experience is that you should not expect binary compatibility.
> Since errors will often be in little used corner cases, it's safer
> to always recompile.
Please do not spread FUD, the OpenSSL project made a commitment a
while back
My experience is that you should not expect binary compatibility. Since
errors will often be in little used corner cases, it's safer to always
recompile.
Sometimes recompiling is enough. Sometimes versions are so incompatible
that you will have to port your application.
However, more recen
Hi,
I'd like to know about it. I have a software developed in 1.0.0b version. I
think it might be better to use some other newer release version, like
1.0.1c.
Will I have any trouble doing this?
I don't know if changes the answer, but it's for arm processor.
Thanks,
Leonardo
