Hi, Tim...
On 09/01/2014 04:45 PM, Tim Hudson wrote:
On 31/08/2014 3:02 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
Rich, what needs to be done to see that OS/2 does not get removed from HEAD?
Can someone provide an OS/2 build environment for team members?
Well, that's kind of a loaded question, but here a
On 31/08/2014 3:02 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
> Rich, what needs to be done to see that OS/2 does not get removed from HEAD?
Can someone provide an OS/2 build environment for team members?
Thanks,
Tim.
__
OpenSSL Project
On 08/31/14 01:15 am, Salz, Rich thus wrote :
> Thanks for the note. Seems like there's enough support to keep it around :)
>
Much appreciated!
--
Lewis
-
Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE, CWTS, EA
Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
Thanks for the note. Seems like there's enough support to keep it around :)
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA
IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz
Hi, all...
Just a quick follow-up from an OpenSSL user on OS/2, running a current
Apache server hosting several SSL sites, concerning dropping OS/2 as an
officially-supported platform: Please don't. :-)
We do have a couple people maintaining the OS/2 builds, and if all that is
required to push ch
I'm not sure what WINDOWS means. And I'm not sure MSFT knows either :)
Less flippantly, the goal is that OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS means any Windows
platform, and then there are subtypes within that. We'll figure it out as we
go along. It's gonna take a while to clean up the #ifdef world without
b
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single "stance",
>> namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment.
>
> Good point.
>
> So the idea is that MSDOS gets turned into DJGPP. BEOS and OS/2 are removed
> in HEAD (i.e., after 1
> Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single "stance",
> namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment.
Good point.
So the idea is that MSDOS gets turned into DJGPP. BEOS and OS/2 are removed in
HEAD (i.e., after 1.0.2), and Microsoft means WINDOWS of various flavors.
If this
> Does anyone want to speak up for the requirement that we continue to
> support BEOS (apparently B/1 and R5?), OS/2, or pre-Windows MSDOS?
Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single
"stance", namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment. 16-bit code was
never supported by OpenS
Does anyone want to speak up for the requirement that we continue to support
BEOS (apparently B/1 and R5?), OS/2, or pre-Windows MSDOS?
Unless there is strong interest and commitment, we will drop these after 1.0.2
/r$
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridg
10 matches
Mail list logo