Re: Platform query

2014-09-01 Thread Lewis Rosenthal
Hi, Tim... On 09/01/2014 04:45 PM, Tim Hudson wrote: On 31/08/2014 3:02 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: Rich, what needs to be done to see that OS/2 does not get removed from HEAD? Can someone provide an OS/2 build environment for team members? Well, that's kind of a loaded question, but here a

Re: Platform query

2014-09-01 Thread Tim Hudson
On 31/08/2014 3:02 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Rich, what needs to be done to see that OS/2 does not get removed from HEAD? Can someone provide an OS/2 build environment for team members? Thanks, Tim. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Platform query

2014-08-30 Thread Lewis G Rosenthal
On 08/31/14 01:15 am, Salz, Rich thus wrote : > Thanks for the note. Seems like there's enough support to keep it around :) > Much appreciated! -- Lewis - Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE, CWTS, EA Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC

RE: Platform query

2014-08-30 Thread Salz, Rich
Thanks for the note. Seems like there's enough support to keep it around :) -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz

RE: Platform query

2014-08-30 Thread Lewis G Rosenthal
Hi, all... Just a quick follow-up from an OpenSSL user on OS/2, running a current Apache server hosting several SSL sites, concerning dropping OS/2 as an officially-supported platform: Please don't. :-) We do have a couple people maintaining the OS/2 builds, and if all that is required to push ch

RE: Platform query

2014-08-20 Thread Salz, Rich
I'm not sure what WINDOWS means. And I'm not sure MSFT knows either :) Less flippantly, the goal is that OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS means any Windows platform, and then there are subtypes within that. We'll figure it out as we go along. It's gonna take a while to clean up the #ifdef world without b

Re: Platform query

2014-08-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single "stance", >> namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment. > > Good point. > > So the idea is that MSDOS gets turned into DJGPP. BEOS and OS/2 are removed > in HEAD (i.e., after 1

RE: Platform query

2014-08-20 Thread Salz, Rich
> Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single "stance", > namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment. Good point. So the idea is that MSDOS gets turned into DJGPP. BEOS and OS/2 are removed in HEAD (i.e., after 1.0.2), and Microsoft means WINDOWS of various flavors. If this

Re: Platform query

2014-08-20 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Does anyone want to speak up for the requirement that we continue to > support BEOS (apparently B/1 and R5?), OS/2, or pre-Windows MSDOS? Minor clarification is appropriate. MSDOS is supported in single "stance", namely DJGPP, which is 32-bit environment. 16-bit code was never supported by OpenS

Platform query

2014-08-19 Thread Salz, Rich
Does anyone want to speak up for the requirement that we continue to support BEOS (apparently B/1 and R5?), OS/2, or pre-Windows MSDOS? Unless there is strong interest and commitment, we will drop these after 1.0.2 /r$ -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridg