Michael Sierchio wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but are you a 501(c)3? Can you communicate
that in a signature line so it's obvious?
The OpenSSL Software Foundation (OSF) is *not* a non-profit
corporation. It was created for the purpose of supporting the
commercial activities of OpenSSL tea
Jason Schultz wrote:
One point of confusion for me, I read this email to say the OpenSSL
FIPS Object Module v1.2 will(may?) not be usable beyond 2010. But in
the first discussion link, I read that to say that the v1.2 Module
will not be suitable for "private label" validations(which require
On 2/19/2010 11:00 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Steve Marquess wrote:
>> In the three years since the open source based FIPS 140-2 validated
>> OpenSSL FIPS Object Module became available many software vendors have
>> directly or indirectly utilized it to realize substantial cost and
>> schedule s
Steve Marquess wrote:
> In the three years since the open source based FIPS 140-2 validated
> OpenSSL FIPS Object Module became available many software vendors have
> directly or indirectly utilized it to realize substantial cost and
> schedule savings. We're glad to see the widespread benefits of
eyond 2010?
I beleive the above to be true, this email cast some doubt, however.
Thanks.
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:27:54 -0500
> From: marqu...@opensslfoundation.com
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Post-2010 future of the OpenSSL FIPS Object Module?
>
>
In the three years since the open source based FIPS 140-2 validated
OpenSSL FIPS Object Module became available many software vendors have
directly or indirectly utilized it to realize substantial cost and
schedule savings. We're glad to see the widespread benefits of these
hard won validation