RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-20 Thread Wade L. Scholine
c: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp > > > > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Wade L. Scholine wrote: > > > Subject: RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp > > > > I don't know about SSL_CTX_set_default_verify_paths(). I >

RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-19 Thread robert
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Wade L. Scholine wrote: > Subject: RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp > > I don't know about SSL_CTX_set_default_verify_paths(). I think what you > really need is SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(). Also for completeness you > have to have SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_l

Re: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-16 Thread robert
fied version of serv.cpp for Borland C++ Builder 4.0. Any ideas would really be apreciated. Robert Sandilands > From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: demos/ssl/serv.cpp > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 11:19:16AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 15

Re: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-16 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 11:19:16AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wade L. Scholine wrote: > > From: Wade L. Scholine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: demos/ssl

RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-16 Thread robert
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wade L. Scholine wrote: > From: Wade L. Scholine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp > Thank you for the reply. I know that the demo's are intended to be m

RE: demos/ssl/serv.cpp

2000-03-15 Thread Wade L. Scholine
The demos are intended to be *minimal* SSL programs. If it had client verification it wouldn't be minimal anymore, now, would it? If you want to see how client authentication works, examine apps/s_server.c and look at what happens when you specify -verify. Keep an eye open for SSL_CTX_set_verify()

Re: demos/ssl: serv.cpp + cli.cpp

2000-01-06 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
I got this going with some editing under Win98. This involved deleting the unknown includes, adding winsock.h, changing file extension to .c (it doesn't need any C++ stuff) and calling WSAStartup() right at the start. Oh and adding a #undef PKCS7_SIGNER_INFO to pkcs7.h... I thought I'd checked t