Re: RSA + OpenSSL + Legal

2000-08-09 Thread Benji Spencer
> It's not copyright (unless you do use rsaref - and then they >do have some copyright code on you) but rather patent (on the RSA >algorithm). The patent expires in another month and a half (September >20 if memory serves me right). from what I read, I need to use rsaref if I am in the

Re: RSA + OpenSSL + Legal

2000-08-09 Thread Eric Murray
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:10:52PM -0500, Benji Spencer wrote: > we are looking at moving from out Netscape Enterprise SSL web server and > going to Apache+SSL (Apache-ssl, Ben's SSL) anyhow..we want to do this > legally, and we know that RSA has some copyright issuesI thought this > would

Re: RSA + OpenSSL + Legal

2000-08-09 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:10:52PM -0500, Benji Spencer wrote: > we are looking at moving from out Netscape Enterprise SSL web server and > going to Apache+SSL (Apache-ssl, Ben's SSL) anyhow..we want to do this > legally, and we know that RSA has some copyright issuesI thought this > would

RSA + OpenSSL + Legal

2000-08-09 Thread Benji Spencer
we are looking at moving from out Netscape Enterprise SSL web server and going to Apache+SSL (Apache-ssl, Ben's SSL) anyhow..we want to do this legally, and we know that RSA has some copyright issuesI thought this would be a problem..but it might not be. I looked at our current NES server