Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module

2010-07-29 Thread Steve Marquess
ja...@nixsecurity.org wrote: Hello, Aside from searching the net, I've learned that the FIPS module for OpenSSL 1.0.0 requires funding for the project and availability of the next FIPS revision (I think). I'm curious if there's an ETA on the module at all? I've also noticed that Redhat

Re: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module

2010-07-29 Thread james
, Jul 29, 2010, 11:29 AM Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module ja...@nixsecurity.org wrote: Hello, Aside from searching the net, I've learned that the FIPS module for OpenSSL 1.0.0 requires funding for the project and availability of the next FIPS revision (I think). I'm curious if there's

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module

2010-07-29 Thread no_spam_98
is based on OpenSSL 0.9.8. Geoff - Original Message From: Steve Marquess marqu...@opensslfoundation.com To: openssl-users@openssl.org Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 9:36:19 AM Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module ja...@nixsecurity.org wrote: Hello, Aside from searching the net, I've

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 FIPS module

2010-07-29 Thread Kyle Hamilton
Without funding, there's zero progress, so it's an ETA of 'never'. RedHat uses a FIPS-validated version of their software-only PKCS11 provider. -Kyle H On 7/29/10 6:35 AM, ja...@nixsecurity.org wrote: Hello, Aside from searching the net, I've learned that the FIPS module for OpenSSL 1.0.0