Maybe this will work - setting the reply to back to the originator.
Those boobs were bouncing mail to the "repy to" instead of return path - then they
blame everyone but themselves. At least if we set the reply to back to the originator
their mail server could have flooded itself - haha.
I don't think you should blame RSE. For all we know he may be visiting friends.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 08:45:22PM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Rich Salz wrote:
>
> > They also said they are not going to be nice any longer. After all,
> > they "explained," it is not their mailing list sending spam, but that
> > it is the fault of, I think they believe, the host of the openssl-users
> > mailing list.
>
> Have you ever tried getting action, or even a response from Ralf?
> He's pretty lame. At the very least, it would be *trivial* to
> exclude non-subscribers from submitting messages. Another change
> would be to set the 'reply-to' header to the originator,
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
