On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:39:52PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Now I have another problem. In trying to call
SSL_CTX_flush_sessions(ssl_ctx, time(0));
I am being blessed with a core dump.
[output deleted]
I could be wrong, but I think that negative value on the timeout is a
bad thing.
On 09/08/01 01:04 PM, Lutz Jaenicke sat at the `puter and typed:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:39:52PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Now I have another problem. In trying to call
SSL_CTX_flush_sessions(ssl_ctx, time(0));
I am being blessed with a core dump.
[output deleted]
I could
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:52:55PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 09/07/01 12:03 AM, Lutz Jaenicke sat at the `puter and typed:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:16:17PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
By using SSL_get1_session() the reference count is incremented and therefore
the sessions will stay
On 09/07/01 08:59 PM, Lutz Jaenicke sat at the `puter and typed:
I'll be very careful with my answer, as I don't program with threads myself.
SSL_get1_session() will increment the reference counter, so that when
the session would be removed otherwise, it will stay available.
If you call
