Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2006-09-14 Thread Rob Dugal
, openssl 0.9.8 appear to interpret this as saying the version is { 01, 00 } Can the authors please clarify? thanks, Rob List:openssl-users Subject: Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a From:Prashant Kumar pkix2005 () yahoo ! com Date:2005-12-13 14:52:05 Message-ID

Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2005-12-13 Thread Prashant Kumar
16 01 00 for a DTLS handshake is the right code16, Content type, and it is a handshakeDTLS version is 01 00Thanks, Prashant.Eduardo Pérez Ureta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you can

Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2005-12-12 Thread Eduardo Pérez Ureta
Maybe you can try: http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1245 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335703 This patch may fix the segmentation fault that I also confirm on openssl-0.9.8a running on linux-2.6.14/686 Some developer should review that patch. (I'll try it

errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2005-12-10 Thread robert dugal
Openssl 0.9.8a is incorrectly encoding the DTLS version as 0x01,0x00 instead of 0xfe,0xff $ ./openssl s_client -dtls1 -debug CONNECTED(0003) write to 0x5d3640 [0x5dd3f8] (119 bytes = 119 (0x77)) - 16 01 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 6a 01 00 00 j... Openssl 0.9.8a is