Hello,
In particular, having a separate certificate for each of the
servers (desktop systems) really could be problematic considering
the number of them, although having one for each client (print
servers) could be feasible.
If you control all this - this may be acceptable.
Someone
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:20:04AM +0200, Marek Marcola wrote:
Hello,
In particular, having a separate certificate for each of the
servers (desktop systems) really could be problematic considering
the number of them, although having one for each client (print
servers) could be feasible.
Hello,
The problem with this is that from what I understand stunnel still
needs a certificate on the server side, so we are back to having to
create/purchase/manage possibly thousands of certificates, which is
entirely impractical, unless running all servers with the same
certificate is
Hi,
I'm currently developping a Python application which is a standalone
xml-rpc server, so with no web server in front of it.
(more details on http://www.pykota.com/software/pykoticon if needed)
this application works perfectly fine, but now I'd like to encrypt
all traffic between the client
