Ok thanks for the information Stephen.
On Jan 16, 2008 3:14 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Fabien Penso wrote:
>
> > > What key size are you using? If it is something large like 8192 bits it
> > > will
> > > take longer. You also have the overhead of run
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Fabien Penso wrote:
> > What key size are you using? If it is something large like 8192 bits it will
> > take longer. You also have the overhead of running the openssl command each
> > time.
>
> standard "RSA Public Key: (4096 bit)", nothing fancy. I feel like 17
> seconds p
> What key size are you using? If it is something large like 8192 bits it will
> take longer. You also have the overhead of running the openssl command each
> time.
standard "RSA Public Key: (4096 bit)", nothing fancy. I feel like 17
seconds per 100 mails is slow. I was hoping I would find a way t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Fabien Penso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if the performance I had for signing emails was
> normal, and how I could improve it. I have the following :
>
> time for i in `seq 0 100`; do openssl -sign -passin pass:something -in
> /tmp/foobar -text -out /tmp/foobar.signed
Hi,
I was wondering if the performance I had for signing emails was
normal, and how I could improve it. I have the following :
time for i in `seq 0 100`; do openssl -sign -passin pass:something -in
/tmp/foobar -text -out /tmp/foobar.signed -signer vserver.crt -inkey
server.key ; done
that takes
