self signing - me as the CA

2002-08-01 Thread David Iungerich
I have a situation where a test box is an NT machine.  It happens to have IIS running on it.  (Won't be using it, but it's there.)  Anyone see any issue with me using it to generate a certificate request, then taking that req over to a Linux box I have running with openssl, use open ssl to b

RE: self signing - me as the CA

2002-08-01 Thread Franck Martin
PROTECTED]Subject: self signing - me as the CA I have a situation where a test box is an NT machine.  It happens to have IIS running on it.  (Won't be using it, but it's there.)  Anyone see any issue with me using it to generate a certificate request, then taking that req over

Re: self signing - me as the CA

2002-08-02 Thread Christian Hohnstaedt
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:34:35AM -0500, David Iungerich wrote: > Based on my needs, I believe utlizing the tools I already have would be best > for me. That said, does anyone have a yes or no answer for me as to whether > it will work. Again, the scenario follows. > > I have a situation where

Re: self signing - me as the CA

2002-08-02 Thread Michael Staszewski II
: "Christian Hohnstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: Re: self signing - me as the CA > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:34:35AM -0500, David Iungerich wrote: > > Based on my needs, I believe utlizing the too

Re: self signing - me as the CA -- FOLOW UP TO MY LAST MSG

2002-08-02 Thread Michael Staszewski II
Friday, August 02, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: Re: self signing - me as the CA > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:34:35AM -0500, David Iungerich wrote: > > Based on my needs, I believe utlizing the tools I already have would be best > > for me. That said, does anyone have a yes or no answe

Re: self signing - me as the CA -- FOLOW UP TO MY LAST MSG

2002-08-02 Thread denny r valliant
> From: "Christian Hohnstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:57 PM > Subject: Re: self signing - me as the CA > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:34:35AM -0500, David Iungerich wrote: > >