I understand the benefits of being able to generate docs and specs from code
since it ensures that these are in synch and that the specs follow what the
code supports but ... in regard to API design this approach leaves something to
be desired. There is much value in designing the APIs up front
On 08/24/2011 03:09 PM, Michael Barton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
>> Rackspace isn't doing their own packaging because of (lack of) Debian
>> support. If they did, they'd have realised almost immediately that the
>> packages actually build on Debian. They're do
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Rackspace isn't doing their own packaging because of (lack of) Debian
> support. If they did, they'd have realised almost immediately that the
> packages actually build on Debian. They're doing it because there'll
> supposedly be differences i
On 08/24/2011 01:11 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2011/8/24 Monty Taylor :
>> - Lack of Debian support. One of the largest current deployments of
>> OpenStack is Rackspace, and they deploy on Debian. (disclaimer, they
>> also pay my salary) This means they are internally maintaining their own
>> set
2011/8/24 Monty Taylor :
> - Lack of Debian support. One of the largest current deployments of
> OpenStack is Rackspace, and they deploy on Debian. (disclaimer, they
> also pay my salary) This means they are internally maintaining their own
> set of packages, and not interacting with ours at all. T
On 08/24/2011 10:22 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Monty,
>
> I've been quite pleased to read your mail. Thanks for that.
>
> On 08/24/2011 11:56 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> This deals with:
>> - Lack of Debian support.
>> - PPAs are Async.
>> - Not integrated with CI.
>> - Lack of RPM suppo
On 08/24/2011 10:56 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> - Lack of Debian support.
>
> - Direct injection to Ubuntu not via Debian. The publically stated
> best-practice for things entering Ubuntu is to be added to/uploaded to
> Debian and then synced, unless there is some compelling reason not to do
> this.
Hi Monty,
I've been quite pleased to read your mail. Thanks for that.
On 08/24/2011 11:56 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> This deals with:
> - Lack of Debian support.
> - PPAs are Async.
> - Not integrated with CI.
> - Lack of RPM support.
> - PPA Fragmentation.
If I may add as well my personal v
2011/8/24 Jorge Williams :
>> Let me start by saying that I have no idea why we're having this
>> discussion again. We talked about it at the design summit and we
>> agreed we'd move forward in pretty much exactly the way Vish describes
>> it.
> I believe I attended all discussions on the compute A
Monty++!
Just FYI
GridDynamics are working well for Packaging RPMs.
http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaInstall/RHEL6Notes-Diablo-3
Its also works on Scientific Linux6.1 (Personally, I prefer free OS :D )
Here is there repos.
http://yum.griddynamics.net/yum/diablo-3/openstack/
They maintains it on t
Hi all!
First, I'd like to give a BIG shout-out to the contributors who helped
fix bugs and write features for the jam-packed D4 milestone release of
Glance:
Brian Waldon
Johannes Erdfelt
Justin Shepherd
Kevin L. Mitchell
Monty Taylor
Rick Harris
Soren Hansen
You can check out the list of featur
Hi all!
First of all, I spoke about something yesterday in terms of being a
done-deal, when it should have been prefaced with "I'm looking at". My
bad, and I certainly apologize for freaking anyone out.
That being said - there are several issues with the current packaging
setup that I've been tas
Inline:
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Let me start by saying that I have no idea why we're having this
> discussion again. We talked about it at the design summit and we
> agreed we'd move forward in pretty much exactly the way Vish describes
> it.
>
I believe I attended al
All,
I have had to switch the wiki.openstack.org wiki to disallow new account
creation through the wiki/web interface. I have changed directions on the
wiki to guide people to email me to ask for a new account, but I wanted to
be sure everyone knows about the change. If you need an account, email m
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 21:12 -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> I think it makes sense to have an openstack-api project with all the
> API docs (specs and learning materials) gathered in one place. I think
> it's preferable to have the API separated out from the code for
> several reasons - ease of review,
15 matches
Mail list logo
