On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Bogott andrewbog...@gmail.comwrote:
I doubt that anyone but me is keeping much of an eye on this extension,
but it nonetheless feels rude for me to unilaterally modify it when it is
already a part of a release schedule.
I've been keeping an eye on
Hi Andrew,
One question, can you clarify/expand on the following sentence from the
blueprint?
Users can create new domains or delete existing ones. When a private domain
is created it can be assigned to an availability zone.
Specifically, the assignment of a domain to an availability zone.
Andrew Bogott wrote:
I am pretty close to fully implementing the api defined in this
blueprint, here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/public-and-private-dns
Alas, I'm also about to attend a meeting at which Wikimedia folks will
almost certainly agree that we need a few
2012/1/5 Jim Curry jim.cu...@rackspace.com:
So now for the update. In reality, there has been a ton of work
occurring to build a proposal that can serve as the basis for a
constructive community conversation. I firmly believe that the best
way to have a conversation with a group as diverse
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:16 -0500, m...@openstack.org wrote:
To kick things off I've created a Foundation page on the wiki and
published a Foundation Mission draft for comment
Nicely done on the Foundation Mission. It covers a lot of ground
concisely. Great start.
Hi Todd,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:29 -0500, Todd Willey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
The previous thread here that I contributed to felt a little like
Thierry and I chatting alone in a giant cavern.
That concerns me for two reasons -
Hi Soren,
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 10:44 +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
2012/1/5 Jim Curry jim.cu...@rackspace.com:
We are basing this initial proposal on a lot of input received from the
community and beyond — developers, users, companies, other open source
projects and foundations, lawyers,
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:11 -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:49:29PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Rick,
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:02 -0600, Rick Clark wrote:
Hey Mark,
First of all, orthogonally, we are very lucky to not have Copyright
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:33:00AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hmmm, so the RNG schemas aren't stable? Is that basically
the problem there (or part of it)? That seems not so good,
since I thought the whole point of publishing schemas was
for people to use them, darn :(
Well there are two
Cool,
Maybe I can get a branch out there that u can start hooking in by early feb.
That would seem like a good use of time :-)
On 1/6/12 3:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:33:00AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hmmm, so the RNG schemas aren't
Thanks for the answers John !
Below are a couple more questions.
On 01/03/2012 07:03 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
Answers inline.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Alejandro Comisario wrote:
So, lets get down to business.
# 1 we have memcache service running on each proxy, so as far as we know,
Scott Moser wrote:
within kvm/qemu, the path that is being worked to getting host-guest
communication outside
of networking is being done via 'qemu-ga'.
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QAPI/GuestAgent
Thats a guest agent that would run inside.
It will communicate over a virtual serial
The best, technical description of the ring was written by the person who had
the biggest role in writing it for swift:
http://www.tlohg.com/p/building-consistent-hashing-ring.html
--John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
On 01 Jan 2012 - 03:23, Ewan Mellor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Richard W.M. Jones
Sent: 21 December 2011 10:56
To: Scott Moser
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:36:58AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Cool,
Maybe I can get a branch out there that u can start hooking in by early feb.
That would seem like a good use of time :-)
Great, sounds like a good plan.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Todd,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:29 -0500, Todd Willey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
The previous thread here that I contributed to felt a little like
Thierry and I
Hi Andrew,
Yes - That makes sense. Thanks!
So, Another question. On EC2, Querying for the external DNS name of an
instance will return its internal IP, if the query originates from the
same availability zone (or maybe region, I can't remember offhand). Is
this planned?
This would (in a
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
* Swift version 1.4.5
released https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg06516.html
Actually, it is not released yet... the milestone-proposed branch has
been cut (and 1.4.6 development has started). Unless a critical issue is
found over the weekend, it should be
Hi Andrew,
EC2 has a feature where if an instance has a fixed IP of 10.0.0.1, and a
floating IP of 1.2.3.4. All DNS lookups performed against the DNS name for
1.2.3.4, from within the same region, will return 10.0.0.1.
E Hammond from Alestic probably explains it better :)
When an EC2 instance
I assume other developers are in the same boat as we often make better
tacticians than politicians.
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Todd Willey t...@ansolabs.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Todd,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:29 -0500,
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Mark McLoughlin
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 2:45 AM
To: Richard Fontana
Cc: OpenStack Mailing List
Subject:
Just an FYI, I'm adding prettytable as a dependency to keystone as part
of our keystone-manage2
(blueprinthttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/keystone-manage2)
implementation.
Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/keystone-manage2
PyPi:
Hello,
I was wondering what people think about adding Cross-Origin Resource
Sharing Headers to all OpenStack APIs by default.
Essentially, this would allow people to make pure frontend javascript
clients, which would could be hosted on domains different than the
API:
http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/
I meant use the kernel package with the -virtual suffix. On Ubuntu 11.10,
there's one called linux-virtual which installs the right thing for you.
You're right that you shouldn't need to do this on 11.10, because that's a 3.0
kernel which should work on anything. The -virtual kernel just has
24 matches
Mail list logo
