[Openstack] Deploying WSO2 with OpenStack API?

2012-02-06 Thread yoyochiang
Just wondering if anyone is deploying WSO2 with OpenStack API? It seems only support EC2 API at this stage. Sincerely, Yoyo Chiang Strategy & Business Division CCMA / ITRI Tel : +886-3-591-4561 Fax : +886-3-583-8246 Mobile : +886-988-580-206 Email : yoyochi...@itri.org.tw ===

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > + There needs to be a way to install on multiple distributions (without > saying go figure out the deps yourself). > I know everyone is ubuntu, ubuntu, ubuntu, but this really needs to be > fixed (process wise as well). > > +1 on supporting m

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Monty Taylor
On 02/06/2012 06:07 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi Stackers, > > tl;dr > - > > There are myriad Chef cookbooks "out there" in the ecosystem and locked > up behind various company firewalls. It would be awesome if we could > agree to: > > * Align to a single origin repository for OpenStack cookb

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Andiabes
The alignment proposal sounds great, and would definitely help reduce redundancy. However, it might be useful to define clear goals of the resulting deployment using these cookbooks. As an example - Looking at the anso recipes for swift - they appear to deploy a SAIO swift cluster. The Crowbar

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Maru Newby
I've submitted a Swift AIO cookbook for review: https://review.openstack.org/#change,3613 It follows the latest single-node AIO instructions pretty much to the letter, so the resulting environment is well-documented. We use this cookbook as the basis for building Swift development environments

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Maru Newby
-1 on multi-distribution devstack. Being cross-platform is arguably a place where chef/puppet/cfengine automation comes into play, and that's not where devstack's self-declared mission lies. +1 to continuing to have Ubuntu be the reference devstack target. Maintaining support for an apt-based

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Andiabes
Jesse, right. The results are here: https://github.com/dellcloudedge/crowbar/tree/openstack-os-build/barclamps . With separate repos for nova, swift, keystone and horizon ( at this location, they're git submodules) The v1.2 tag deploys diablo/stable. Most Cookbooks are written to be useable wi

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Jesse Andrews wrote: > I know that the RCB deploy team works with the Crowbar team on chef > recipes for that project. > > Regarding the github.com/ansolabs & github.com/rcb recipes - I'll have > to delegate to Vishy who worked on those. They were the basis of dan an

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Jason Cannavale
RCB deploy has a set of chef cookbooks we use for diablo all in one testing (minus swift) in addition to the work we have been doing with the crowbar team. Since we seem to be adding to the problem, we'd be happy to collaborate on the consolidation.. Jason On Feb 6, 2012, at 20:56, "Jesse Andr

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/06/2012 09:37 PM, Jesse Andrews wrote: I know that the RCB deploy team works with the Crowbar team on chef recipes for that project. OK. Are you in agreement about the proposal in my email? Regarding the github.com/ansolabs& github.com/rcb recipes - I'll have to delegate to Vishy who w

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Jesse Andrews
I know that the RCB deploy team works with the Crowbar team on chef recipes for that project. Regarding the github.com/ansolabs & github.com/rcb recipes - I'll have to delegate to Vishy who worked on those. Jesse On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi Stackers, > > tl;dr > -

[Openstack] [GLANCE] Easy blueprint for a new contributor to pick up

2012-02-06 Thread Jay Pipes
Hey Stackers, I don't have the bandwidth to get this blueprint done, but if someone is interested in completing it, I would be inclined to support a freeze exception to get it into Essex since it would not be changing any interfaces or implementation -- just adding new event notifications to

[Openstack] confused about libvirt nwfilter and iptables rules

2012-02-06 Thread heut2008
hi,all: I am confued about how security rules works ,i read the /nova/virt/libvirt/firewall.py and /nova/network/linux_net.py , my understanding is when create or change a security rule ,the process is as below. reuqest to nova osapi->update db for the rule->call method trigger_se

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Jesse Andrews
Agreed. Supporting more than just ubuntu is important! On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > + There needs to be a way to install on multiple distributions (without > saying go figure out the deps yourself). > > I know everyone is ubuntu, ubuntu, ubuntu, but this really needs to

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Mark Collier
Awesome leadership on this Jay! (And Matt) You should come down to Austin more often :) Definitely seems like an area with a lot of duplicated effort. Jay Pipes wrote: Hi Stackers, tl;dr - There are myriad Chef cookbooks "out there" in the ecosystem and locked up behind various company

[Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Stackers, tl;dr - There are myriad Chef cookbooks "out there" in the ecosystem and locked up behind various company firewalls. It would be awesome if we could agree to: * Align to a single origin repository for OpenStack cookbooks * Consolidate OpenStack Chef-based deployment experien

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
+ There needs to be a way to install on multiple distributions (without saying go figure out the deps yourself). I know everyone is ubuntu, ubuntu, ubuntu, but this really needs to be fixed (process wise as well). :-/ On 2/6/12 5:12 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: cc'ing Matt Ray from OpsCode, since

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Jay Pipes
cc'ing Matt Ray from OpsCode, since he and I discussed related topics this past Thursday during the bug squash day... On 02/06/2012 06:35 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: I think the thing you are discussing already exists. devstack is currently part of and managed by all of the normal OpenStack develo

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sure I think CURL commands are the least of the problems though. Just getting this devstack "python" version running on multiple distributions is a pain enough (pkg dependencies, conf files are different...) That's one of the other benefits I see, the current stack.sh would turn pretty ugly rea

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Jesse Andrews
Our team had discussions on python vs. bash at the beginning of devstack. If we go with python it would be nice to do something similar to python-novaclient where setting DEBUG lets users see CURL commands that you can execute to do the same thing. That said, we are focused on essex until the des

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Monty Taylor
On 02/06/2012 10:37 AM, Jesse Andrews wrote: > I think having a session on devstack at the summit would be valuable. ++ > I'm still torn on it being python vs. bash because I see > non-developers using it all the time because they can take snippets of > the shell script and use it. I'm simila

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Monty Taylor
I think the thing you are discussing already exists. devstack is currently part of and managed by all of the normal OpenStack development infrastructure. The canonical repository for it is https://review.openstack.org/p/openstack-dev/devstack which is mirrored to https://github.com/openstack-dev/d

Re: [Openstack] Nova command line versus Euca2ools

2012-02-06 Thread Michael J Fork
Can you verify your glance endpointTemplate is http://%HOST_IP%:9292/v1 ? Hard to tell from the trace below if the "v1.1/1/images/detail" is against the Nova API or Glance API. Michael - Michael Fork Cloud Architect, Emerging Solutions IBM Systems

[Openstack] Propose to make Monsyne Dragon a nova core developer

2012-02-06 Thread Matt Dietz
Hey guys, Dragon has really stepped up lately on reviewing patches into Nova, and has a ton of knowledge around Nova proper, so I propose he be added to Nova core. I think he'd be a great addition to the team. Matt ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.

[Openstack] Nova command line versus Euca2ools

2012-02-06 Thread Lillie Ross-CDSR11
I currently have OpenStack installed (using the ManagedIT PPA) to use Keystone for authentication. However I'm still receiving a number of "Malformed request URL" messages, both in Dashboard as well as when using the Nova command line client. Also, some of the Euca2ools command run OK, others

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
So the part that worries me about what u just said is the part about "it is already some kind of official project". When you have to question whether a project is official or not, that seems to pretty make the whole point for making it official ;) Overall though I think what u are saying is corr

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Christian Berendt
Hello together. > I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a > "official" openstack project, instead of being a "unofficial > project". I think devstack.org is already some kind of official project (provided by Rackspace Cloud Builders). Where is the benefit of becoming a core

Re: [Openstack] Extensions, code vs. API

2012-02-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
Yes some extensions modify core code. We are trying to strike a middle ground between ease-of-implementation and stability. Stability of the API is vital, so public facing features definitely need to be extensions until we create a new version of the api. Internal stability is less important, s

Re: [Openstack] Atlas-LB - what's the project status?

2012-02-06 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Jesse, Thank you for quick answer and interesting information. Personally I like the idea of multiple projects as ecosystem around OpenStack core. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh Mirantis Inc. On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Jesse Andrews wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > NOTE: this is my opinion - I do not

[Openstack] Extensions, code vs. API

2012-02-06 Thread Andrew Bogott
I've just finished re-reading 'OpenStack API Extensions -- an overview.' I understand the distinction between a core API and an API extension, and the value of that distinction is clear. What I don't understand is how that distinction plays out when it comes to implementation. Within

Re: [Openstack] Swift and devstack.

2012-02-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On 6 Feb 2012, at 19:33, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > >> Another thing I want to implement is to add Swift as a back-end to Glance. > Wait, what is this then > [zaitcev@lembas glance-tip]$ ls glance/store/swift.py My email may not have been very clear, I am talking about configuring swift and glance vi

Re: [Openstack] Atlas-LB - what's the project status?

2012-02-06 Thread Gabriel Hurley
I would add that the Horizon team has been hard at work in the Essex release cycle to support this "ecosystem" concept as well. The Essex release has been completely re-architected for extensibility; any project can easily add their own dashboards, panels, etc. via reusable components. We'll be

Re: [Openstack] Swift and devstack.

2012-02-06 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:53:36 +0100 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Another thing I want to implement is to add Swift as a back-end to Glance. Wait, what is this then [zaitcev@lembas glance-tip]$ ls glance/store/swift.py glance/store/swift.py [zaitcev@lembas glance-tip]$ cat .git/HEAD ref: refs/heads/m

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hmmm, I'm not sure I agree with that. The "its just a shell script" argument only works when its pretty simple, setting up all these components is not simple. I think you are dumbing down your sysops to much :-) I think that having a well documented python script can be just as easy to follow, i

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Interesting, what is the non-developer use case or the one u see as > existing? > This is my own personal opinion and not as commiter of devstack.sh, I found very valuable to point sysops to devstack.sh with the argument "it's just a shell

[Openstack] multiple floating ip pools

2012-02-06 Thread Xu (Simon) Chen
Hi all, I am running devstack and got a dev instance of OpenStack running. I am happy to see the concept of multiple floating IP pools, and the per-floating-ip interface in the trunk, which I consider a very good basis for my blueprint proposal here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/mu

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Sean Roberts
Hmm. Sounds like a good idea. I will reach out to the board and ask. ~sean On Feb 6, 2012, at 10:34 AM, "Joshua Harlow" mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote: Hi all, Over the weekend I was thinking (I know a first, haha). I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a "official

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Interesting, what is the non-developer use case or the one u see as existing? Can't they take snippets of python code as well ;) On 2/6/12 10:37 AM, "Jesse Andrews" wrote: I think having a session on devstack at the summit would be valuable. I'm still torn on it being python vs. bash because I

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Duncan McGreggor
On 06 Feb 2012 - 10:29, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the weekend I was thinking (I know a first, haha). > > I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a > "official" openstack project, instead of being a "unofficial project". > Since it seems like pretty much every develo

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Jesse Andrews
I think having a session on devstack at the summit would be valuable. I'm still torn on it being python vs. bash because I see non-developers using it all the time because they can take snippets of the shell script and use it. Jesse On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi all

[Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi all, Over the weekend I was thinking (I know a first, haha). I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a "official" openstack project, instead of being a "unofficial project". Since it seems like pretty much every developer (and even CI) is either depending on the shell scr

Re: [Openstack] Atlas-LB - what's the project status?

2012-02-06 Thread Jesse Andrews
Hi Oleg, NOTE: this is my opinion - I do not speak for all of OpenStack! While our focus is on a successful Essex, the RCB team has started thinking about Folsom. Our current thoughts is focusing on enabling an eco-system **around** core. OpenStack shouldn't try to be IaaS, PaaS and SaaS - inst

Re: [Openstack] glance performance gains via sendfile()

2012-02-06 Thread Rick Jones
If one wants to experiment with the performance effects of sendfile(), the netperf benchmark has a "TCP_SENDFILE" test which complements the TCP_STREAM test. It can also report CPU utilization and service demand to allow a comparison of efficiency. netperf -H -t TCP

[Openstack] Swift and devstack.

2012-02-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, I was meaning to do add the feature of launching the swift services in the foreground in a screen/tmux window' instead of in foreground but would like to gather ideas before implementing it. Currently for the Swift All in One we launch 4 (3 replicas and one hand-off) different services:

[Openstack] Atlas-LB - what's the project status?

2012-02-06 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Hello, everyone What is the status of this LBaaS project for the OpenStack? As far as I know, the open-source version is compatible with OpenStack. But is it possible to merge the Java code in the OpenStack ecosystem? Is someone working on re-implementing Atlas-LB in Python and eventually adding t

Re: [Openstack] Swift S3 with Keystone anyone?

2012-02-06 Thread Akira Yoshiyama
Hi Pete, 2012/02/06 10:56 "Pete Zaitcev" : > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:03:54 +0900 > Akira Yoshiyama wrote: > > > I modified the wiki: > > http://wiki.openstack.org/Keystone-BP-S3Token > > > > I added authtoken in main pipeline just now. > > I was unable to find the official configuration for "auth

Re: [Openstack] three things about OpenStack docs

2012-02-06 Thread Jaesuk Ahn
Anne, This is Jaesuk Ahn from Korea User Group. Since the opening of OpenStack Korea Community last year, we have been keeping our (korean) wiki to share the information among the members. http://wiki.openstack.or.kr Most of wiki contents is about "overview" and "installation". Most of wiki conte

[Openstack] glance performance gains via sendfile()

2012-02-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Hi Reynolds, I've been looking into your interesting idea around sendfile()[1] usage, here are a few initial thoughts: - There's potentially even more speed-up to be harnessed in serving out images from the filesystem store via sendfile(), than from using it client-side on the initial uploa

Re: [Openstack] EC2 API (euca2ools) vs OpenStack API (novaclient)

2012-02-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/06/2012 04:48 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: Thanks All, @Jaypipes - I'm quickly coming to a point where I'm looking at describing tasks using both nova client and euca2ools - its certainly not a bad thing, the issue would be on simplicity (i.e. showing people how things can be done vs you could

Re: [Openstack] Cross-Origin Resource Sharing & OpenStack APIs

2012-02-06 Thread Adrian_F_Smith
Sorry for bringing up an old thread but since the question was asked I thought someone might find this CORS middleware module I worked on useful. https://github.com/adrian/swift/tree/cors What it does is examine each request, decide if it's cross origin or not and then deal with it appropriatel

Re: [Openstack] how to make merge proposal to openstack-manuals

2012-02-06 Thread Kei.masumoto
Thanks for your help! Kei There is additional specific information at : http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/HowTo mike ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launch

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Essex dead wood cutting

2012-02-06 Thread Nathanael Burton
+1!! On Feb 6, 2012 5:38 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:52:17AM +, Armando Migliaccio wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge, the ESXi support is up to date. There may > be bugs, but which virt driver is perfect ;)? > > > > Sateesh may know more, because he is th

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Essex dead wood cutting

2012-02-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:52:17AM +, Armando Migliaccio wrote: > To the best of my knowledge, the ESXi support is up to date. There may be > bugs, but which virt driver is perfect ;)? > > Sateesh may know more, because he is the main contributor/maintainer from > Citrix. > > However, as Vi

Re: [Openstack] EC2 API (euca2ools) vs OpenStack API (novaclient)

2012-02-06 Thread Kevin Jackson
Thanks All, @Jaypipes - I'm quickly coming to a point where I'm looking at describing tasks using both nova client and euca2ools - its certainly not a bad thing, the issue would be on simplicity (i.e. showing people how things can be done vs you could do this or you could do that - that choice bit