Re: [Openstack] Are the Python APIs public or internal?

2013-03-01 Thread Daryl Walleck
I certainly use them daily. I actually use an interesting wrapper called Supernova (http://rackerhacker.github.com/supernova/) which allows for multi-user/multi-environment configurations. While the clients may not be as critical as the APIs themselves, they're something I certainly rely on heav

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] [nova] Call for Help -- OpenStack API XML Support

2012-08-09 Thread Daryl Walleck
As part of my work on Tempest, I've created an alternate backend configuration to use XML requests/responses. This right now mostly covers Nova, but could easily be extended to test other projects as well. I hadn't pushed it yet because it seemed to be low priority, but I'd be more than glad to

Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-qa-team] wait_for_server_status and Compute API

2012-06-18 Thread Daryl Walleck
I can verify that rescue is a non-race state. The transition is active to rescue on setting rescue, and rescue to active when leaving rescue. Original message Subject: Re: [Openstack-qa-team] wait_for_server_status and Compute API From: Jay Pipes To: "openstack-qa-t...@lists.l

[Openstack] Agenda for QA Status Meeting for 6/7

2012-06-06 Thread Daryl Walleck
The weekly QA Team meeting takes place at 17:00 UTC on IRC (#openstack-meeting on Freenode). We invite anyone interested in testing, quality assurance and performance engineering to attend the weekly meeting. The agenda for this week is as follows: * Status of Swift tests (Jose) * Status of p

Re: [Openstack] Quotas... 1 of 1 instances? What's the deal?

2012-06-04 Thread Daryl Walleck
Hey Jay, I'm seeing the same incorrect messaging. From what I've observed, this happens when you exceed your quota. The failure is right but the message is wrong. I opened a bug for this last week. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1006218 Original message Subject: [Ope

[Openstack] Agenda for QA Status Meeting for 5/10

2012-05-08 Thread Daryl Walleck
Weekly team meeting The OpenStack QA Team holds public weekly meetings in #openstack-meeting, Thursday at 13:00 EST (17:00 UTC). Everyone interested in testing, quality assurance, performance engineering, etc, should attend! Agenda for next meeting * Review of last week's action items (jayp

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Aligning "smoke" / "acceptance" / "promotion" test efforts

2012-05-08 Thread Daryl Walleck
s possible. Tim From: openstack-bounces+tim.simpson=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net<mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.simpson=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net> [openstack-bounces+tim.simpson=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net<mailto:openstack-b

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Tempest Devstack/Jenkins gate job now passing

2012-05-04 Thread Daryl Walleck
This is great news! Thanks Jay for all the hard work you've put into getting this up and running. Daryl On May 4, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > All, > > A momentous event has occurred. We now have all Tempest integration tests > passing against the devstack-deployed test environment s

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Aligning "smoke" / "acceptance" / "promotion" test efforts

2012-05-03 Thread Daryl Walleck
lementing the clients for the sake of testing accomplish? Double the maintenance effort for the same result, imho. Cheers, Maru On 2012-05-03, at 12:54 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote: So my first question is around this. So is the claim is that the client tools are the default interface for the a

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Aligning "smoke" / "acceptance" / "promotion" test efforts

2012-05-03 Thread Daryl Walleck
So my first question is around this. So is the claim is that the client tools are the default interface for the applications? While that works for coders in python, what about people using other languages? Even then, there's no guarantee that the clients in different languages are implemented in

Re: [Openstack] running Tempest continuously in the openstack project?

2012-02-27 Thread Daryl Walleck
having. Daryl On Feb 27, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Ionuț Arțăriși wrote: > On 02/27/2012 05:13 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote: >> I'm actively looking into any issues. I have all these tests passing locally >> in my environment, so the issues seem to be focused around people using >&

Re: [Openstack] running Tempest continuously in the openstack project?

2012-02-27 Thread Daryl Walleck
This isn't really a bug in either project, but a configuration issue. The name of the endpoint isn't static, so making it 'nova' or 'compute' may not always be correct. If you check the name of your Compute project that's returned in the Keystone auth request, you can find the name and configure

Re: [Openstack] running Tempest continuously in the openstack project?

2012-02-27 Thread Daryl Walleck
I'm actively looking into any issues. I have all these tests passing locally in my environment, so the issues seem to be focused around people using devstack. I've made some merge prop's that will take care of a few of the issues. One issue that will certainly come up is that if you have rate li

Re: [Openstack] devstack: excercises script other than shell scripts

2012-02-25 Thread Daryl Walleck
Just a brief note, but the Swift QE guys are going to have their tests in Tempest in the near future. I'm helping them work through getting it ready. Daryl From: openstack-bounces+daryl.walleck=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net [openstack-bounces+daryl.wa

Re: [Openstack] running Tempest continuously in the openstack project?

2012-02-22 Thread Daryl Walleck
We're running Tempest as part of our continuous build. For the bug you're referring to David, there is a configuration in Tempest where the name of the Nova/Compute project can be set, so I don't think its fair to say that Tempest is currently broken. However, I am working on a more comprehensiv

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Finding a new time for our weekly meeting?

2012-02-21 Thread Daryl Walleck
That time still works for me. Would be starting that this week (tomorrow)? Daryl On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi QA Team, > > Unfortunately, I have another meeting happening at the same time as our > weekly IRC meeting in #openstack-meeting, and it's a meeting I really need

Re: [Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-02 Thread Daryl Walleck
Hi Gabe, I think what Nachi is saying is that these parameters can be taken in a create request, but are not documented (I say this also because I've seen this in novaclient as well). I know they're not required, but I'm curious what their purpose is. Daryl On Dec 2, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Gabe

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

2011-10-25 Thread Daryl Walleck
Hi everyone, This is just my opinion, but I've only found WADLs very useful when use tool based automation. To me they're a huge headache to read. To me, the current dev guide style of documentation has been far more helpful in developing automation. Daryl On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Anne Gen

Re: [Openstack] [QA] openstack-integration-tests

2011-10-19 Thread Daryl Walleck
stack-bounces+donald.ngo=hp@lists.launchpad.net<mailto:openstack-bounces+donald.ngo=hp@lists.launchpad.net> [mailto:openstack-bounces+donald.ngo=hp@lists.launchpad.net<mailto:hp@lists.launchpad.net>] On Behalf Of Brebner, Gavin Sent: Wednesday, October 1

Re: [Openstack] [QA] openstack-integration-tests

2011-10-19 Thread Daryl Walleck
Hi Rohit, I'm glad to see so much interest in getting testing done right. So here's my thoughts. As far as the nova client/euca-tools portion, I think we absolutely need a series of tests that validate that these bindings work correctly. As a nice side effect they do test their respective APIs,