It is strange.
The node is only for Quantum-{linuxbridge, dhcp, l3}-agent.
As far as I know, the quantum private network that is not associated with a
quantum router
has only ns-xxx interface.
The quantum private network otherwise have both ns-xxx and qr-xxx interfaces.
Thanks,
David
Thanks, Brian.
My answers are put in your email with "-->".
David
- Original Message -
> On 07/24/2013 10:42 AM, David Kang wrote:
> >
> > If I remove the following REJECT rules, it works perfectly.
> > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-p
size 65535
bytes
13:48:46.892785 IP 192.168.3.3 > 10.12.182.13: ICMP echo request, id 46605, seq
1855, length 64
13:48:46.892825 IP 192.168.3.2 > 192.168.3.3: ICMP host 10.12.182.13
unreachable - admin prohibited, length 92
- Original Message -
> On 07/23/2013 11:41 PM, D
iptables -t filter -I FORWARD -i qg-+ -o qr-+ -j ACCEPT
iptables -t filter -I FORWARD -i qr-+ -o qr-+ -j ACCEPT
But it doesn't work for me.
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> On 07/23/2013 12:22 PM, David Kang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
Thank you, Brian.
David
- Original Message -
> On 07/23/2013 12:22 PM, David Kang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are running OpenStack Folsom on CentOS 6.4.
> > Quantum-linuxbridge-agent is used.
> > By default, the Quantum node has the foll
I think I found the solution.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889868
It was reported as a bug by RedHat.
It also suggests a work-around.
Thank you everyone.
David
- Original Message -
> What I have observed so far is...
>
> 1. nova-compute sends dhcp re
s are running on CentOS6.4 in our system.)
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
>
> This is very interesting..:)
> I am using openstack grizzly allinone with quantum/neutron.
>
>
> Look what I am observing.
> -before starting an instance on the serv
We use CentOS 6.4, which does not support network namespace.
So "ip netns .." fails.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> that will not show the rules for the instance. try this
> ip netns exec iptables -nxvL
>
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 09:59 , David Kang
67" on my Quantum node.
I used "service iptables status" command to check the firewall rules.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> Please can you look up in the iptables?
> Normally on a working openstack host the packets comming in the filter
> tabl
Quantum network work well
than just commenting them out?
I'll appreciate your help.
David
--
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to
ne.
But, I think it should work as it is because 10.12.183.1 is lower than
10.12.83.1 in
the routing table.
What could be wrong?
I will appreciate any help.
Thanks,
David
--
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Comput
our
Virtual Memory Streaming (vms) technology and how we integrate with
OpenStack to address many of these issues.
Please register for the webinar here: goo.gl/QQTVW
I hope that some of you are interested and will be able to attend.
Thanks,
David
website: www.gridcentric.com
describe shortly your setup and the reason
behind choosing Apache front end?
DH
Regards,
David Hadas,
Openstack Swift ATC, Architect, Master Inventor
IBM Research Labs, Haifa
Tel:Int+972-4-829-6104
Fax: Int+972-4-829-6112
From: "Ali, Saqib"
To: Chmouel Boudjnah ,
Cc:
the fact that you have only one replica. If you
had 3, and you could not reach one, you could still reach the other two
(and the ring makes sure not to move more than one replica at a time...)
DH
Regards,
David Hadas,
Openstack Swift ATC, Architect, Master Inventor
IBM Research Labs, Haifa
Tel
,
David Hadas,
Openstack Swift ATC, Architect, Master Inventor
IBM Research Labs, Haifa
Tel:Int+972-4-829-6104
Fax: Int+972-4-829-6112
From: "Vengurlekar, Tushar V (USD-SWD)"
To: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net"
,
Date: 27/06/2013 05:43 PM
Subject:
information from
multiple backend LDAPs.
So this sounds like a feasible solution
David
On 21/05/2013 15:18, Adam Young wrote:
OK, I think it makes sense. If we keep roles and role assignments in
the same place, we don't have the ability to do more complex
assignments. So the four bac
AShish,
Your email and the problem you described puzzled me.
I think I realize what had happened, but not sure.
First a background question:
1. what is the replication ratio used in your cluster?
You indicated an SAIO - so you must have 3 replicas, but I am still not
sure how all that had happ
mains into their own separate Keystone database,
this fine, it does not effect the overall model. So, your proposal fits
into this high level model, but this high level model provides much more
flexibility to implementers and will allow for future expansion
regards
David
On 20/05/2013 17:46,
summit).
Thank you very much,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com]
Sent: May-11-13 4:18 PM
To: David Hill
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Guest PXE Boot
Neat!
Have you seen any of the work around nova baremetal (which is
tran
Handoff is chosen based on the Ring at the proxy, after the object server responding that it had failed to store the data or after any other error while attempting to approach the object sever (e.g. timeout). DHRegards, David HadasResearch Staff Member, Master InventorIBM Research Labs, HaifaTel
swift is concerned ;)Hope this helps. DHRegards, David HadasResearch Staff Member, Master InventorIBM Research Labs, HaifaTel:Int+972-4-829-6104Fax: Int+972-4-829-6112-Mark Brown wrote: -To: David Hadas/Haifa/IBM@IBMILFrom: Mark Brown Date: 05/12/2013 08:27PMCc: "open
ed as long as the hard-drive they are in have space.DHRegards, David HadasResearch Staff Member, Master InventorIBM Research Labs, HaifaTel:Int+972-4-829-6104Fax: Int+972-4-829-6112-"Openstack" wrote: -To: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net" From: Mark Brown Sent by: &
Same first THREE letters actually. Bonus points.
On May 11, 2013, at 7:07 PM, David Shrewsbury wrote:
> quark
>
> Keeps the sciency theme going, same first two letters, and represents
> something
> fundamental to other sciency stuff (much like networking is fundamental
quark
Keeps the sciency theme going, same first two letters, and represents something
fundamental to other sciency stuff (much like networking is fundamental to
OpenStack).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
-Dave
On May 11, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Jeremy Stanly on IRC just s
Hi guys,
I was trying to PXE boot a guest for quite some time now and I think I've
found a solution that is kind of hackish but pretty simple. I'm not quite
sure it's good to go in trunk but felt like I'd share it since I've been
messing a while on this.
If anybody have a better solution,
s/Hadoop-and-Swift-integration. This is the
branch that's getting submitted back to Apache for inclusion in Hadoop.
Hope that helps,
-David
From: Vaidy Gopalakrishnan mailto:gva...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:06 PM
To: Clay Gerrard mailto:clay.gerr...@gmai
Daniel,
This is the expected behavior. With nova-network, FLIPs are assigned as a
secondary address on the host interface, and traffic is routed to your
instances via NAT rules. I'd recommend reading the following blog post from
Mirantis for more information:
http://www.mirantis.com/blog/configur
the current environment. In your
case, after you get that response you'd probably just want to let the request
continue on the pipeline instead of just completely overriding it like the bulk
middleware does.
David
On Apr 21, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Itamar O wrote:
> Hello list,
>
gg:swift#slo
min_segment_size = 1
I also added support for Static Large Objects in python-swiftclient:
https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient for example:
swift upload testcontainer testfile -S 1048576 --use-slo
creates a SLO object with 1MB segments.
David
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:22 P
s the packets to the external network,
the Quantum network node routes internally because it knows both network.
I want the traffic to be routed to the external network through the
Quantum router. But it doesn't happen.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message ---
?
Currently, I manually set up routings for those two subnets.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> Hi David,
>
>
> The quantum network node would route traffic between the non-DMZ-DMZ
> network if both of those subnets are uplinked to the same quantum
> router. I bel
between DMZ network and
non-DMZ network within itself by default.
Have anybody configured Quantum for this case?
Any help will be appreciated.
We are using Quantum linuxbridge-agent.
Thanks,
David
--
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scienti
is called only once at dnsmasq startup
and never at IP ack/release.
I've found a package (dnsmasq-2.62-1.el6.rfx.x86_64.rpm) that is more recent
and everything is behaving as expected.
Dave
From: Nathanael Burton [mailto:nathanael.i.bur...@gmail.com]
Sent: March-23-13 4:15 PM
To: David Hil
From: Robert Collins [robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: March 23, 2013 02:21
To: David Hill
Cc: Kevin Stevens; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] DHCP release
On 23 March 2013 14:53, David Hill wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> T
eleased IP as soon as
the VM is deleted? Since we deleted the VM, why keep it in the database?
Thank you very much,
Dave
From: Kevin Stevens [kevin.stev...@rackspace.com]
Sent: March 22, 2013 18:01
To: David Hill; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [
Hi guys,
I'm experiencing some kind of weird behaviour with our
openstack setup here.
Let me explain:
I create an instance that gets an IP: 172.0.0.3
I destroy the instance.
I recreate an instance that will get another IP: 172.0.0.4.
If I wait 600 seconds between each test, 172.0
But you should be registering the Panel like
settings.register(EC2ListPanel)
or settings.register(ec2list.EC2ListPanel)
not ec2list
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wyllys Ingersoll [mailto:wyllys.ingers...@evault.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:04 AM
To: Lyle, David (Cloud
There's a couple of changes that you need to make...
First, edit the overrides.py file: (e.g., if we wanted to add the panel to the
admin dashboard so this uses the admin dashboard slug: 'admin')
import horizon
from path_to_module.panel import YourNewPanelClass
admin_dashboard = horizon.get_d
iple private network case.
Does anybody have any idea/answer/correction?
I cannot put "Network Node" in public network.
I hope someone can have a solution to this problem.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> Hi Jeff,
> Thanks for looking into this but the masquerade s
t;host" entry on the table points to the old host
instead of the new one, so deleting a host will hang, etc.
Thanks
-David Stearns
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https:/
the
community align on the need to offer control over placement, between geo
distributed sites, but if this is not the case, we need to find a way
to accommodate the different requirements without complicating the design.
Regards,
David Hadas
--
DH
Regards,
David Hadas
IBM Research Labs
Hi Pete,
I added the signing_dir to the authtoken config file and it works. Thanks a lot
!
signing_dir = /tmp/keystone-signing-swif
Thanks,
-David
-Original Message-
From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zait...@redhat.com]
Sent: 2013年3月4日 12:59 AM
To: Tao, Dao (David, ISS-MSL-SH)
Cc
service
[composite:main]
use = egg:Paste#urlmap
/v2.0 = public_api
/ = public_version_api
[composite:admin]
use = egg:Paste#urlmap
/v2.0 = admin_api
/ = admin_version_api
Thanks & Regards,
David
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
The Tempest (QA) team certainly considers them to be public and we just
started getting some contributions that are testing novaclient. In other
work I am also a consumer of several of these APIs so I really hope they
don't break.
-David
On 3/1/2013 8:50 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
I be
Now that we are at feature freeze, is there a description of
incompatible configuration or api changes that happened since Folsom?
That is, a description of how deploying grizzly differs from deploying
folsom.
-David
On 2/22/2013 7:21 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Martinx - ジェームズ wrote
will change for different
login sessions. The solution is for the ACL to use a persistent identity
attribute of the user which comes from the user store, rather than to
use the transient Keystone user ID
regards
David
On 18/02/2013 16:16, pat wrote:
Hi David,
Well, it might be useful. I forg
custom plugin modules. So if you have your own proprietary SSO
protocol you can write plugin modules for this
Kristy can let you Pat have an alpha version for testing if he wants it.
regards
David
On 18/02/2013 15:59, pat wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to disturb, but I have some questions regarding
if you would like an alpha copy of the above for testing
regards
David
On 06/02/2013 14:54, Mballo Cherif wrote:
Hi everybody !
I am wondering if it’s possible to delegate keystone Authentication to
an Authentication against a server (I have one Strong Authentication
server) or an Identity
I'm sorry- I didn't read that part about the proxy restart :) The proxy may
not log if it gets hung up in some middleware. What middleware do you have
running? You can try adding in some log messages into the middleware you have
running to find out where.
On Feb 1, 2013, at 1:37
Sounds like swift isn't listening on that port. What is the bind_port in your
proxy-server.conf?
On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Andrey V. Romanchev wrote:
> Hello!
> I've installed swift + keystone and have incomprehensible problem
>
> First of all I get auth tokens
> curl -d '{"auth": {"tenantN
etimes not. This has to be a bug some where even if
it is not in nova. There is a lot of mechanism here that I don't
understand. If there is documentation some where about exactly how to
use metadata to install an ssh key I can't find it. Do you have any more
advice?
-David
ty argument could also be used to inject the file. This is
odd because key_name is a documented part of nova client, as the files
mechanism. So what is the recommended way to do what the key_name
argument is documented to do?
I think if key_name is not intended to work it should be removed fro
specify different storage domains in oVirt.
>
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 4:16 PM, David Busby wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > An interesting idea, but I am unaware if nova supports storage affinity
> in any way, it does support host affinity iirc, as a kludge you could have
> say
ining separate zones for
deployment?
Cheers
David
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> It is for nova.
>
> Im not sure I understand. I want to be able to say to openstack;
> "openstack, please install this instance (A) on this mountpoin
er from the brief reading I've been
doing into it.
Cheers
David
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I have /nfs1mount and /nfs2mount or /nfs1mount and /glustermount can I
> control where openst
Hi Guillermo,
Would not modifying the local_settings.py and changing the OPENSTACK_HOST
to reference a node other than 127.0.0.1 resolve the issue?
Cheers
David
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Guillermo Alvarado <
guillermoalvarad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW I am trying to use
write penalty's per
configuration.
As I recall (though this was from way back in October 2010) the suggested
method of deploying swift is onto standalone XFS drives, leaving swift to
handel the replication and distribution.
Cheers
David
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:12 AM, JuanF
outliers can replace the standard service with one of
their own choosing
regards
David
On 13/11/2012 17:35, heckj wrote:
So maintaining a token scoped to just the user, and a mechanism to
scope it to a tenant sound like all goodness. We can absolutely keep
the API such that it can provide
and I have some comments/questions on it. How
do you want these to be addressed? By email, or by edits to you blueprint?
regards
David
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-isolation-and-roles-
delegation
http://wiki.openstack.org/Keystone/Service-Isolation-And-Roles-Delegatio
David
On 13/11/2012 14:38, Adam Young wrote:
On 11/10/2012 10:58 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
I agree with the vast majority of what Jorge says below. The idea I
would like to bounce around is that of the unscoped token.
What does it mean conceptually? What is its purpose? Why do we need
it? Why
ServerActionsTestBase is not the test class. You have to use
ServerActionsTestJSON (or XML).
Look at the bottom of
https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/tests/compute/servers/test_server_actions.py
-David
On 11/9/2012 8:04 PM, Stef T wrote:
Hey Ravi,
Cool, and how do
services/endpoints/tenants. So one must then ask, what is the difference
between the most widely scoped scoped-token and the unscoped token?
Surely they will have the same scope won't they? In which case there is
no need for both concepts.
Comments please
regards
David
On 23/10/2012 06:25,
ype_extra_specs=cpu_arch:tilepro64
Our bare-metal provisioning code is still in review.
David
- Original Message -
> Yes sure,
>
>
>
> But in this example you use an existing key “free_ram_rmb”?! Ist that
> right?
>
>
>
> What I want to do is to create my own key
as an attempt to add such
middleware to swift. It is
generic CORS support but seems
to have been rejected in favor of putting CORS support in swift directly
and checked in last week:
https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/74b27d504d310c70533175759923c21df158daf9
-
kent) I use my kent
user id and prepend @kent.ac.uk, and the infrastructure automatically
routes my request and pw to the kent authentication server for
validation (via Radius).
We should be considering this sort of federated feature (or something
like it) for Keystone with domains
regards
Davi
But it should be, since one might have an authz policy that
bases its decision on the age of the user.
So how about considering a more generic interface where any attribute
name and value can be passed, and the authz service will use these to
see if they fit the policy or not.
regards
Da
o".
this is certainly a possibility.
regards
David
Maybe the url contains
the Domain Name or ID in the path, and Horizon pulls this out of its own
url (assuming that's possible) and hence the user is never given an
option to chose a domain. A Cloud Admin would use a "non
manage the discussion.
We can discuss this issue again among the people who signed up the new mailing
list.
Thanks,
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -----
> David Kang wrote:
> >
> > Hello a
,
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help
(http://etherpad.openstack.org/GrizzlyHPC)
Hope to see you there.
Thanks,
David
------
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack
;d both perform
the same API operation, resulting in wasted resources in the best case
and data corruption in the worst case.
--
David Ripton Red Hat drip...@redhat.com
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : open
eal story about this? Or am I
just doing something wrong?
-David
On 10/1/2012 1:20 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
From the release notes:
http://wiki.openstack.org/ReleaseNotes/Folsom#Ubuntu_12.04_.2BAC8_Ubuntu_12.10
On Oct 1, 2012 1:17 PM, "Matt Joyce" <mailto:matt.jo...@clo
use master. A number of people are working on
tempest/quantum testing. There was a discussion a week or two ago based
on this http://etherpad.openstack.org/quantum-tempest. I suggest you
coordinate with those folks so as to not duplicate effort.
-David
ossible to upgrade a system using the test ppa to the
final release in the CloudArchive (and, if so, how)?
Thanks,
David
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/
I've followed the instructions for setting logging using the local0 and local1
facilities. I've modified rsyslogd's config to add those logs. I get the
startup info for each thread, but that's it. Is there a common oversight in the
extant docs that's leaving out a piece of crucial info? I want L
Webex,
https://usc-isi.webex.com/mw0306ld/mywebex/default.do?siteurl=usc-isi
password: dodcs
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -
> While setting up webex, please call
> 1-866-528-2256; code: 3289
While setting up webex, please call
1-866-528-2256; code: 3289628
for the audio conference.
Thanks,
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> We will use different webex host today becaus
Hello,
We will use different webex host today because of some technical problem.
Sorry for that.
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -
> I am guessing your intent is to determine the maximum available
&g
I finally found the place to search the archives. I think this is the
answer:
https://answers.launchpad.net/swift/+question/148450
I will have a play.
On 08/28/2012 02:56 PM, David Krider wrote:
> I seem to be having this exact problem, but the fix doesn't work for me:
&
I seem to be having this exact problem, but the fix doesn't work for me:
https://answers.launchpad.net/swift/+question/157858
No matter what I set the default_swift_cluster to, or if I add a bind_ip
to the DEFAULT section, I can't get X-Storage-Url to come back as
anything other than localhost:
; as the key.]
'HostManager.service_state' is { : { : { cap k : v }}}.
The followings were suggested for new "HostaManager.service_state'
{ : { : { : { cap k : v
{ / : { : { cap k : v }}}
Please correct/edit it.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> Hi Micha
bare-metal machines in
the 'service' table.
In addition to that I think you suggest augmenting 'host' field in the
'service' table,
such that 'host' field can be used for RPC.
(I don't think the current 'host' field can be used for that purpose n
e?
Or do you suggest adding 'service_hostname' field in the 'service' table?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> openstack-bounces+mjfork=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on
> 08/27/2012 02:58:56 PM:
>
> > From: David Kang
> > To: Vishvana
ame) instead of (host) only in host_manager.py.
'HostManager.service_state' is { : { : { cap k : v }}}.
It needs to be changed to { : { : { : { cap
k : v .
Most functions of HostState need to be changed to use (host, hypervisor_name)
pair to identify a compute node.
Are we
to use a little more than hostname. Perhaps
> (hostname, hypervisor_hostname) could be used to update the entry?
>
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> I would investigate changing the capabilities to key off of something
> other than hostname. It looks from the
2 | 4 | bespin101.east.isi.edu |
++++
Then, nova db (compute_nodes table) has entries of all bare-metal nodes.
What do you think of this approach.
Do you have any better approach?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> To elaborate, some
iqueness is enforced, it can be any string, I believe.
Thanks,
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
>
> Could someone give a practical overview of how configuring and using
> the
them to handle 'capability' as a
list of dictionary.
If my understanding is correct, it would affect many parts of the scheduler.
Is it what you recommended?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
> This was an immediate goal, the bare-metal nova-compute node could
&g
on
another node.
Regards
David
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Anton Beloglazov <
anton.belogla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I haven't had a chance to run any performance tests yet. What kind of
> tests would you suggest?
>
> Thanks,
> Anton
>
>
Hi Anton,
Thanks for this, having a quick read through it looks great.
I'd be interested to know what sort of performance you see with gluster
providing a replicated file system, have you been able to do some high I/O
"burn in" tests on guests?
Thanks
David
On Fri, Aug 17,
hat you mentioned in a new file
baremetal_host_manager.py.
We will not use baremetal_host_manager.py but will modify host_manager.py
directly.
I'm not sure if we have to change the scheduler.
c) I think "used" field my work. We'll look into it.
Thanks,
David
Hi Vish,
Is this discussion for long-term goal or for this Folsom release?
We still believe that bare-metal database is needed
because there is not an automated way how bare-metal nodes report their
capabilities
to their bare-metal nova-compute node.
Thanks,
David
>
> I am inte
to use RPC (instead of db access) to access
those information from multiple bare-metal nova-compute nodes.
Thanks,
David
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI
- Original Message -
> Can you elaborate what is the purpose of this datab
in nova db from bare-metal nova-compute
is OK, we are OK to put the bare-metal tables into nova db.
Please let us know your opinions.
Thanks,
David, Mikyung @ USC/ISI
--
Dr. Dong-In "David" Kang
Computer Scienti
they are not
documented by 'nova help boot'.
Beats me why this is the case...
-David
On 8/7/2012 1:47 PM, Patrick Petit wrote:
Dear All,
Looking into the details of the request_spec part of a RPC message
ensuing a nova boot command.
There is a 'num_instances' : 1 prope
functionality. Users who can successfully identify
themselves as members of the UK academic community will be automatically
enrolled as cloud users and given appropriate tenant IDs.
I look forward to having fruitful discussions with you about federated
access to OpenStack.
regards
David
nt it.
-David
On 7/30/2012 9:31 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Bhuvaneswaran A <mailto:bhu...@apache.org>> wrote:
Team,
As per patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9497/ we are adding
keyring support for "openstack" client. If p
the same with flavor
m1.large the resulting image is 10Gb. Is there a way to create
snapshots that don't result in huge images?
-David
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubs
ers) would more than compensate for that.
-David
On 7/16/2012 8:04 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/12/2012 05:40 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Excellent points. Let me make the following proposal:
1) Leave the code in nova-volume for now.
2) Document and test a clear migration path to cinder.
3) Take
As someone who is a way north of london; would something like a google+
hangout be possible to tie in for those interested but unable to attend?
On Jul 4, 2012 4:58 PM, "Day, Phil" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> ** **
>
> I’m thinking it’s about time we had an OpenStack User Group meeting in the
> UK ,
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
