We have several deployments of customers with StackOps running on NetApp
like a breeze.
Check this document: https://communities.netapp.com/docs/DOC-24892
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
+1
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Endre Karlson endre.karl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, I would like to propose Moniker
* Asymmetric/Symmetric transparent encryption/decryption of files when
uploading/downloading using GnuPG.
KimDotCom must be really scared! Are you going to build an alternative to
MEGA.co.nz based on Swift ? ;-)
Nice stuff man!
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
Hi gtt,
what does it mean for you 'lots of instance simultaneously'? 100, 1000,
1, more?
We have launched 100 (but less than 1000) simultaneously without any
issue. Rabbit running in a multicore with several gigs of RAM with out of
the box configuration.
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
is strong enough in the scenario.
于 2013年02月19日 16:54, Diego Parrilla Santamaría 写道:
Hi gtt,
what does it mean for you 'lots of instance simultaneously'? 100, 1000,
1, more?
We have launched 100 (but less than 1000) simultaneously without any
issue. Rabbit running in a multicore
Thanks Vish,
This is something I always forget to ask: I'm curious about the historical
reasons for dnsmasq instead of ISC-DHCP managed with OMAPI, for example.
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29
We have used Gluster for small deployments, but lately we have changed our
mind. Basically we have bet on Gluster for 2013 because of:
- 10GbE everywhere, and Gluster MUST run in 10GbE (or Infiniband)
- 3.3 release fixes some issues when locking big files: Granular locking
- libgfapi reborn, no
cloud-init and it's variants:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CloudInit
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:42 AM, JuanFra
You can change the endpoint type in Horizon:
Modify this file:
/etc/openstack-dashboard/local_settings.py
and add (or edit) this property:
OPENSTACK_ENDPOINT_TYPE=endpoint_type
and endpoint_type can be internalURL, publicURL and adminURL, as usual.
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
mmm... not sure if the concept of oVirt multiple storage domains is
something that can be implemented in Nova as it is, but I would like to
share my thoughts because it's something that -from my point of view-
matters.
If you want to change the folder where the nova instances are stored you
have
.
Regards,
JuanFra.
2012/12/20 Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com
mmm... not sure if the concept of oVirt multiple storage domains is
something that can be implemented in Nova as it is, but I would like to
share my thoughts because it's something that -from my
control, and
rigor around changes that the inbound API has.
** **
I would guess that Ceilometer will have some requirement around this ?
** **
Phil
** **
*From:* Diego Parrilla Santamaría [mailto:
diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 10 October 2012 09:18
*To:* Day
Hi Anton,
really interesting stuff. We are also in very early stages in a research
project to automate VM consolidation.
Most of the studies focus on information taken from power supplies and
physical devices. We are more interested in looking for patterns of
applications usage (database hits,
It would be great if you can share the code, no matter if it's in Diablo.
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nathanael
Nicolas,
it makes a lot of sense what you want to do. ZFS+iSCSI is a perfect fit for
vm storage, some other IaaS solutions already use this combination (and I
have developed some). Keep in mind that Nexenta is only a distro based upon
OpenSolaris: OpenIndiana, FreeBSD... there are a lot of
for your ideas about vm storage.
In my proposal/question, I got in mind (for now) volume more than vm
storage (with the zfs property allowing nfs sharing, I believe that vm
storage can already be done with zfs backend).
--- Nicolas
On 2012-06-10 17:58, Diego Parrilla Santamaría wrote:
Nicolas
great job!
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Sébastien Han han.sebast...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
I
Hi Wolfgang,
latest versions of our distro supports NFS as backend storage for
instances, volumes and images. Basically a zone shares the same NFS
mountpoint for instances and another mountpoint for volumes, and I guess it
does not differ a lot from what you want to do with FC or iSCSI.
It's in
Awesome Javier
Anxiously waiting for a meeting with you guys to see your progress!
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Thu, Apr 26,
+1
From a security stand point I am curious what you see the benefit as?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Michael Grosser d...@seetheprogress.net
wrote:
Hey,
I'm following the openstack development for some time now and I was
wondering if there was a solution to spin up encrypted
Sounds like you have access to keystone, but you don't have access to
nova-api...
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:56 PM,
You can set quotas per tenant. If you have Horizon installed may be you can
modify quotas in the System Panel.
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
*
*
On Thu,
Immaturity of a platform is something you can easily fix paying the right
fee to your favorite analyst firm.
Seriously, Openstack is an open platform and an open community. This means
problems and issues are open to discuss to everyone. Propietary platforms
issues are rarely disclosed, and they
We use nfs backed instances a lot, and this problem normally has to do with
wrong permission management in your filer and/or client.
Check if not only root can write on the nfs share (specially libvirt user).
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | *
Hi Anthony,
yes your fix worked like a charm. We have change the novnc version to the
cloudbuilders one in our distro. The nova-manage service command returns
that novnc-console status as disabled, but it's a minor bug. We also had
some problems with numpy, but now it's working.
I have attached
Thanks Anthony,
we use the 'official' noVNC from https://github.com/openstack/noVNC in our
distro. We are going to make a new build pulling from cloudbuilders'
repository and let's see how it works.
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | *
tried to use the cloudbuilders branch for diablo but it doesn't work
with firefox 11 or chrome 18.
Diego, does it works for you?
2012/3/29 Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com
Thanks Anthony,
we use the 'official' noVNC from https://github.com/openstack/noVNC
I'm not familiar with nova-diagnostics, but we use collectd to gather
information about each virtual machine running in KVM. We get information
about cpu usage, memory, disk io, and network io per instance. Obviously
it's not nicely integrated with nova commands, but it works in our
deployments.
Hi folks,
yesterday we started to see this error when we tried to open a VNC console
with Firefox 11.0:
Websock error:[object event]
and in the error console we have:
Fecha y hora: 27/03/12 13:03:42
Error: Firefox no puede establecer una conexión con el servidor en
Hi Nicolas, thanks for using our distro!
Just to summarize:
- Single node
- Management network: 192.168.163.0/25 = 192.168.163.1 to 192.168.163.126.
Let's assume gateway = 192.168.163.1
- Service Network: 192.168.163.128/25 = 192.168.163.129 to 192.168.163.254.
gateway should be = 192.168.163.129
Alexey,
Here goes a sample what we use in the distro:
FlatDHCP
./nova-manage network create service 10.0.0.0/24 1 256
--bridge=br100--bridge_interface=
bond1 --dns1=8.8.8.8 --dns2=8.8.4.4
VlanManager
./nova-manage network create service 10.0.0.0/24 1 256 --vlan=100
--bridge_interface=bond1
Great job Sandy,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you are using the events generated and
described in the SystemUsage blueprint (
http://wiki.openstack.org/SystemUsageData).
We are going to send a new blueprint (or I should say a part II of the
existing blueprint) to extend the current
Stefano,
what about people not in the authors file but proposing new or upgraded
blueprints for Folsom?
Ciao
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
**
On
We have developed a QEMUDriver for stable/diablo, sadly the essex build is
still broken. We are a bit overwhelmed, and we would like to contribute it
in the future (gue rivero will help us with Gerrit).
Still, if anybody wants to test it in stable/diablo, we are more than open
to help him to use
immediately delete it
and any attachments and notify the sender by reply e-mail. In such case,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or
use of this message or any attachments, for any purpose, is strictly
prohibited by law.
2012/2/14 Diego Parrilla Santamaría
Joshua, most of non-english speaking developers I know try to use english
for class names, methods, fields, constants... English is the 'lingua
franca' for code, so even developers with bad english level like me try to
use english all the time... so internationalized logging messages do not
make
Hi Roman,
our StackOps Distro is based in 10.04 and we had to modify some packages to
make Diablo work with kvm: we changed qemu-kvm 0.12 to 0.14:
- qemu-common_0.14.0 and
- qemu-kvm_0.14.0.
Don't know if it can help, but you can give a try...
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
Hi Michael,
we deploy with an Apache + mod_proxy in front of all the nova APIs
processes. It works reasonably well. For Horizon we use Apache + WSGI mod
(well... everybody knows Horizon is a different beast...).
Tomcat is a different beast, for JVM stuff, you know. Openstack is python.
Cheers
Just listening Johnny Cash's 'Folsom Prison Blues'!
... so my vote goes to...
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com/
**
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM,
Wow! Didn't know about it. Really valuable information. I have been looking
for that information for ages.
Happy New Year folks,
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
*
Hi,
sounds like ovs-ofctl is not in the path.
BTW, we decided to wait for quantum support in essex, but please don't
hesitate to drop us an email and we will try to help you.
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com/*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34
Hi Alexandre,
you can build a simple SingleNode in Flat Network mode with our StackOps
Distro: http://www.stackops.org
Once you have installed and configured the Single Node, then you can go to
/etc/nova/nova-controller.conf and you can find the configuration details.
If you feel brave enough
2011/12/16 Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com
Hi Alexandre,
you can build a simple SingleNode in Flat Network mode with our StackOps
Distro: http://www.stackops.org
Once you have installed and configured the Single Node, then you can go
to /etc/nova/nova
Hi all,
we have modified the Solaris volume driver code to work with Nexenta Block
Storage. Actually, we have succesfully deployed solutions with Nexenta and
Nova already.
You can check the code here:
https://github.com/StackOps/nova/tree/stable/diablo
So, we are happy to collaborate on this.
Frans,
the single node configuration of the Stackops Distro can work in very modest
environments. A P4 and 1.5GB should be enough if you want to deploy m1.tiny
instances with QEMU. If you want to manage the deployment in a training lab
probably you should check the tool.
Cheers
Diego
-
--
Diego
Try these:
http://cyberduck.ch/
http://www.gladinet.com/
Cheers
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com
*
*
ADVERTENCIA LEGAL
Awesome Vish. I will give this network option a try!
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com
*
*
ADVERTENCIA LEGAL
Le
We are testing this flag for the 0.3 version of the Stackops Distro. Our
goal is to restart the VMs in a different compute-node if a server fails
automatically.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
Hmm, this flag needs to be set when the instance is
further?
-Shehjar
Diego Parrilla Santamaría wrote:
it seems fixed range and network size they don't match.
It seems you are running a small environment. Try with this parameters:
/usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/ http://10.0.0.0/248 1 255
and
--fixed_range=10.0.0.0/ http
Wow! I cannot explain it better! Gracias Leandro!
Basically, your nova nodes don't need internet access, but your browser
yes.
Diego
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Leandro Reox leandro.r...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Stackops official doc says :
*Internet access in the Openstack Nodes*
You
If you are considering FlatDHCP instead of VLAN, may be our distro can help
you: http://www.stackops.org
Still, you can manually change a running Stackops deployment to VLAN. It's
not a daunting task for an environment like yours.
Diego
P.D.: Sorry for this rather 'bizdev mode' announcement.
--
Hi all,
We can reproduce the problem in our environments with the images downloaded
from http://uec-images.ubutu.com :-(
Diego
--
Diego Parrilla
http://www.stackops.com*CEO*
*www.stackops.com | * diego.parri...@stackops.com** | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla*
* http://www.stackops.com
Hi all,
we are testing the Cactus release of Openstack Nova and we tried to bundle a
Windows instance with 'euca-bundle-instance' as follows:
Client OS: Ubuntu Natty 64 bits
euca2ools and dependencies: what comes in Natty by default, main-31337
2009-04-04 (1.3.1, because 1.2 did not have
Hi,
this is an issue in our Multi-Node arquitecture of the Stackops
Openstack Nova Distro. We have not verified 100% yet if it fix the
issue, but I think Hugo has found the reason and the solution, so my
sincere kudos, Hugo.
We will release a maintenance release once we verify that the rules
Vish,
I miss the 'Notifications and Statistics' session. May be some of the
guys there can correct me (Jay?) if I'm wrong but we talked about:
- Extend Nova with a a server-to-server web-hook-based
publish/subscribe protocol: PubSubHubBub.
- Define a message format to describe the notification
I have found some random issues if you don't set the lock_path to a
writeable directory in Cactus. Never saw any issue in Bexar. Hence, in
the new version of our distro the lock_path parameter is always set.
--
Diego Parrilla
CEO
www.stackops.com | diego.parri...@stackops.com | +34 649 94 43 29
Hi Jay,
some random thoughts:
1) OVF support. I know it's not exactly a disk image format, but
probably we could look deeper if it make sense to add OVF or not. And
if not, where does it fit in the overall architecture.
2) Understand what is contained in the disk images. Is this a
prerequisite
I think it's a great feature, considering the problems to scale a
shared storage like NFS.
I was wondering if some Service Provider out there is going to
implement a shared storage to take advantage of the new KVM live
migration features of Cactus.
--
Diego Parrilla
CEO
www.stackops.com |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Persistence != HA. What are we talking about here? Both? I'm not sure...
Agree. Replication has to do more with DR services than HA. I tried to
prioritize instances Highly Avalaible and persistent instances (two
different
Hi Nelson,
we have successfully deployed a multinode installation of Nova with
our distro Stackops on a VMware ESXi 4.1. QEMU is the only available
emulator when running on top of a hypervisor.
I guess you can use our distro to deploy on any Cloud Provider that
allows you to upload an ISO image
+1 to Europe!
--
Diego Parrilla
CEO
www.stackops.com | diego.parri...@stackops.com | +34 649 94 43 29 |
skype:diegoparrilla
ADVERTENCIA LEGAL
Le informamos, como destinatario de este mensaje, que el correo
electrónico y las comunicaciones por medio de
I think we had this conversation before some weeks ago. From my perspective
I think networking services are normally not considered as first class
citizens of the 'Virtual Datacenter'. What Ishimoto-san describes is a
Virtual Switch. But networking services in the day-in day-out operations
include
I forgot to add something to my 'wishlist' ;-)
Changing the way we configure Nova should be a process announced in
advanced. One or two releases in advance, to give enough time to teams
doing deployments and upgrades of Nova to be prepared. Changes that
can impact in the upgrade of the product
Hi Monsyne,
it's a very interesting topic and I'm curious about the reason why you
are using the Flat Networking set up. From the conversations in other
threads it seems the Service Providers prefer different networking
approaches: VLAN oriented basically.
Regards
Diego
-
Diego Parrilla
2011/1/14 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
2011/1/14 Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com:
Well... VMX is probably too VMware oriented. My only concern about this
kind
of proprietary parameter file is you don't really have the chance to
control
its lifecycle. New
2011/1/13 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
2011/1/13 Diego Parrilla Santamaría diego.parrilla.santama...@gmail.com:
An appliance is the combination of metadata describing the virtual
machine
plus the virtual disks. The standard format in the virtualization
industry
is OVF. Basically, differs
An appliance is the combination of metadata describing the virtual machine
plus the virtual disks. The standard format in the virtualization industry
is OVF. Basically, differs from VMX+VMDK(s) because it has a XML format that
describes the virtual machine (and little bit its environment like
67 matches
Mail list logo
