[Openstack] Keystone PTL candidacy

2012-09-04 Thread Joe Heck
I am running to continue my position as Keystone PTL. I have been PTL for Keystone for the past 6 months, and involved lightly through the year prior. I am an active contributor, reviewer, community participant, as in my role at PTL have been spending a significant amount of time coordinating

[Openstack] [keystone] canceling keystone weekly meeting for 7/17

2012-07-15 Thread Joe Heck
Sounds good to me - I'll be at OSCON as well, so the Keystone meeting will be cancelled this week. Wiki page (http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting) updated. -joe On Jul 15, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, Being at OSCON this week I propose that we skip

Re: [Openstack-poc] [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)

2012-06-22 Thread Joe Heck
On Jun 20, 2012, at 3:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: The current PPB had a discussion yesterday on the bylaws for the Foundation Technical Committee (TC), mainly around whether PTLs should get reserved seats on the TC. I would like to summarize the options and extend the discussion to the

Re: [Openstack] Keystone API V3 - draft 2 now available

2012-06-21 Thread Joe Heck
Sorry for the delayed response - some bits inline. On Jun 18, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: I added lots of comments on the google doc. I think most of them reinforce the existing design decisions. That said, there are a few high-level issues I’d like to ask for discussion on: 1.

Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-poc] Thoughts on client library releasing

2012-06-18 Thread Joe Heck
Monty - Thierry stated it as an assumption last PPB meeting, but I'd like it to be explicit that we have at least a tag on each client library release that we make so that it's possible to distribute a version of the clients. -joe On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: We're

Re: [Openstack-poc] openstack-common bug spam

2012-05-08 Thread Joe Heck
None from me. On May 8, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey, I see this list gets a bunch of bug spam because the POC team is listed as a driver for the openstack-common library: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-common-drivers/+members#active The doesn't make much sense to

Re: [Openstack-poc] 3rd Party APIs

2012-05-06 Thread Joe Heck
The reason I said c and not b is because there may be something in the future that we see that really, really needs to belong in the kernel of an OpenStack system. By choosing B, categorically it seemed like an assertion that none of these 3rd party APIs (or plugins or whatever) could *ever*

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Design Summit - Fall 2011 Location Request

2011-03-29 Thread Joe Heck
+1 Seattle, but we need to have something in Europe too... -joe On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Stephen Spector wrote: Developers: I have started early planning on the next OpenStack Design Summit in early October 2011 this year and would like to get some feedback on location options. The