Those both sound pretty cool.
If you submit a patch (via gerrit) to the
https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/doc/source/associated_projects.rst
document, then you can have these projects listed on
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/associated_projects.html
--John
On Jul
Swift supports Range requests, so you are able to make a GET request with the
Range header starting with the first byte you didn't fetch the first time.
--John
On Jul 10, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Jonathan Lu jojokur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all stackers,
I have realized downloading large
You can set
log_level = DEBUG
in the [DEFAULT] section of your config files.
https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/etc/proxy-server.conf-sample#L19
--John
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:37 AM, CHABANI Mohamed El Hadi
chabani.mohamed.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I want to active the
Swift itself also reports well over 130 unique metrics about itself via StatsD,
including the bandwidth for each client request (like ceilometer does). You can
monitor these with any standard statsd listener, and monitoring this data
doesn't require integration with any other openstack project
The global clusters feature is Swift is very new and just now being finished
up. We are finishing up the last part of it and will have it completed in our
next release (tentatively scheduled for June 27). The last part is the affinity
write (ie don't write to a WAN region).
The regions concept
Also, just as general info, don't use nginx in front of Swift. nginx buffers
request bodies, and that can become very problematic when uploading content
into the Swift cluster (especially since the body could be up to 5GB--not too
many of those requests and you'll overload your nginx box).
Yes it will work, but I would not recommend it for production systems. There
were some changes in Keystone during the Grizzly release that are pretty much
required for Keystone to be usable with Swift (specifically around Keystone's
ability to support token caching).
My recommendation would be
and should
be compatible with folsom and have the fix you need for caching (the
cache=swift.cache parameter to have in auth_token). You will need a
recent version of swift tho to get everything working well.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
Yes it will work
This is quite possible to do, and in fact one thing that we keep in mind with
every Swift release: deployers must be able to upgrade without any lapse in
availability.
The basic steps are:
- stop background processes
- upgrade packages (system and/or swift)
- restart processes
- start
Sure, easy to do (curl is what I normally use anyway).
To auth (for auth v1. v2 and keystone will be different):
curl -i -H X-Auth-User: foo -H X-Auth-Key: bar http://swift/auth/v1.0
The 2 headers you need to look for are X-Storage-URL and X-Auth-Token.
After that, use the X-Auth-Token to talk
The given options (DNS, SW load balancer, and HW load balancer) are all things
I've seen people use in production Swift clusters.
As mentioned in another reply, DNSRR isn't really load balancing, but it can be
used if nothing else is available.
One thing to consider when choosing a load
On May 31, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Luse, Paul E paul.e.l...@intel.com wrote:
I’m looking at tacking this item:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/support-storage-server-redirects
and wanted to get some feedback on the following observations/thoughts:
1) This is a capability that
Replication will be logged and you can look for a Object replication complete
log message.
For a more detailed look at how swift handles failures, you can watch this
video:
http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux.conf.au/2013/mp4/Playing_with_OpenStack_Swift.mp4
(I need to post my blog post that has
There are no plans to change the current implementation of tempurl.
In order to generate a tempurl that can be validated without relying on a
network call to a centralized authority service, the owner and the service must
have a shared secret. In the tempurl feature, this shared secret is set
nothing in swift requires rabbit, qpid, or zeromq
--john
On Feb 19, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi All,
When I was doing a Swift/Keystone only install with DevStack I used the
following in my localrc
disable_all_services
enable_service key
This part of the code gets the account info, but if the account isn't found and
account autocreation is set (eg for tempauth and keystone), then we need to
create the account first before returning the info.
However, since there are multiple replicas of the account in the cluster, we
can't
This is the result of `python ./setup.py develop`. That command sets up the
scripts to reference your local source so that active dev work is immediately
reflected.
`python ./setup.py install` would actually copy the scripts to the right
locations.
--John
On Feb 11, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Kun
I'm happy to announce that Swift 1.7.6 has been released. This release
is the work of twenty five contributors. As always, you can upgrade to
this release with no downtime for your clients.
You can find download links at https://launchpad.net/swift and the
Launchpad release tracking at
We've cut he milestone-proposed branch for Swift 1.7.6. It's scheduled to be
released next Thursday January 24. Please take a look and let us know of any
issues you find ASAP.
Candidate tarball:
http://tarballs.openstack.org/swift/swift-milestone-proposed.tar.gz
The full proposed changelog
graycol.gifJohn Dickinson ---01/11/2013 04:28:47 PM---If effect, this would
be a complete replacement of your rings, and that is essentially a whole new c
From: John Dickinson m...@not.mn
To: Alejandro Comisario alejandro.comisa...@mercadolibre.com,
Cc: openstack-operat
If effect, this would be a complete replacement of your rings, and that is
essentially a whole new cluster. All of the existing data would need to be
rehashed into the new ring before it is available.
There is no process that rehashes the data to ensure that it is still in the
correct
I've scheduled a bi-weekly Swift team meeting for Swift contributors. Starting
tomorrow, we will meet in #openstack-meeting every other Wednesday at 11am
Pacific, 1pm Central, 1900 UTC.
For tomorrow's meeting, we will be discussing Swift's next release and the
current outstanding patches
It's pretty simple. Swift uses the underlying filesystem to store the data on
disk, and so you can use normal FS tools to find and inspect your data.
For the object server, the magic happens here:
https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/obj/server.py#L117
The end result is that
.
--
Shashank Sahni
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:55 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
check out the README at https://github.com/fujita/swift3 for the correct
proxy server config section.
--john
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Shashank Sahni shredde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm
You can run your swift cluster with 2 replicas. This is set when the ring is
first created. You can use `swift-ring-builder` (ie with no arguments) to get
usage help. Note that there is not (yet) an easy way to change your replica
count once the ring has been created.
If you have more than one
check out the README at https://github.com/fujita/swift3 for the correct proxy
server config section.
--john
On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Shashank Sahni shredde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install swift 1.7.4 on Ubuntu 12.04. In order to enable the s3
support, I added the
You could use a project like slogging (http://github.com/notmyname/slogging) to
run inside the cluster and aggregate that information from account dbs and logs.
--John
On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:48:35 -0800
Ning Zhang
From the Swift perspective, there isn't any reason other services can't be run
on the Swift boxes. I'd check for a few things, though.
1) Make sure dependencies aren't in conflict. Thanks to the work of the CI
team, this should be mostly sane.
2) Obviously, monitor your systems and don't
This is already supported in Swift with the concept of availability zones.
Swift will place each replica in different availability zones, if possible. If
you only have one zone, Swift will place the replicas on different machines. If
you only have one machine, Swift will place the replicas on
anything like it?
If not, im wondering how, for example rackspace handles this kind of issues (
ignoring all the CDN thing )
Cheers.
---
Alejandrito
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
This is already supported in Swift with the concept
Since the CORS support in Swift allows the preflight OPTIONS response to be
different on a per-container basis (which is correct in a multi-tenant system),
the CORS support was added directly into Swift's proxy server rather than as
middleware. In order to fulfill the OPTIONS request, container
, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
A 507 is returned by the object servers in 2 situations: 1) the drives are
full or 2) the drives have been unmounted because of disk error.
It's highly likely that you simply have full drives. Remember that the usable
space in your cluster is 1/N where N
A 507 is returned by the object servers in 2 situations: 1) the drives are full
or 2) the drives have been unmounted because of disk error.
It's highly likely that you simply have full drives. Remember that the usable
space in your cluster is 1/N where N = replica count. As an example, with 3
Fast on the heels of a productive summit in San Diego, we are getting ready to
release Swift 1.7.5. Our current schedule is to cut the QA release on November
5 and, assuming it passes all QA tests, prepare the final release on November 8.
This is quite a solid release with a ton of bug fixes
Sorry for the delay. You've got an interesting problem, and we were all quite
busy last week with the summit.
First, the standard caveat: Your performance is going to be highly dependent on
your particular workload and your particular hardware deployment. 3500 req/sec
in two different
are
so i can know where to tune in case i need to.
Thanks !
---
Alejandrito
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
Sorry for the delay. You've got an interesting problem, and we were all quite
busy last week with the summit.
First, the standard caveat: Your
Reminder for today's meeting.
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:59 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
As we finish up Folsom and head into the Grizzly summit, I'd like to have a
Swift community meeting.
Who: The Swift community (users, deployers, contributors, core devs)
When: October 1, 2012
The 404s on object PUTs are probably related to the timeout errors you are
seeing on the container servers. This may be because of IO contention on your
hardware (eg overtaxed drives). How does the disk IO look on your physical
hardware?
The disk full errors may be because you are running out
As we finish up Folsom and head into the Grizzly summit, I'd like to have a
Swift community meeting.
Who: The Swift community (users, deployers, contributors, core devs)
When: October 1, 2012 at 8pm (UTC), 3pm (Central), 1pm (Pacific)
Where: #openstack-meeting on freenode (IRC)
Agenda:
The intended purpose of this string comparison is to explicitly compare every
character. Doing it this way guards against timing attacks
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_attack).
--John
On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Mike Green iasy...@gmail.com wrote:
def streq_const_time(s1, s2):
the Essex release, but I wanted to publicly thank everyone who
contributed to Swift during the Folsom release cycle. The following people have
code contributions in Swift during the Folsom release cycle. Thanks again!
Greg Holt
John Dickinson
Darrell Bishop
Samuel Merritt
Florian Hines
David Goetz
you can force a replicator to push to a handoff node by unmounting the drive
one of the primary replicas is on.
--John
On Sep 6, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks , John and Chmouel ,
I did post a question about this long time ago. And my test result is match
I am running to continue my position as Swift PTL.
I have been involved with swift since the project started. I am an active
contributor, reviewer, and community participant. I have lead meetups about
swift, given conference presentations on swift, and am active in IRC helping
those who have
Swift 1.7
=
The next release of Swift will be version 1.7. This will be our
release for OpenStack Folsom, and is scheduled land mid-September.
There is an important change for deployers in this release. This
email has the details so you can begin planning your upgrade path.
What's the
With the current implementation of versioning in Swift, this isn't possible.
It's better to think of the feature as versioned writes.
--John
On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:13 AM, ZHOU Yuan dunk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi stackers,
I'm trying to understand the object version feature in Swift.
In the
Swift has many exciting features coming in the OpenStack Folsom
Release this fall, but where do we go from here? What's next for Swift
in grizzly?
I've got some ideas. I'd like to mention them and see where you the
community will take them. I've written up most of them into quick one-
line
We just released Swift 1.6.0 last Monday
( https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg15505.html ). We've got a lot
of great features and improvements in it, and I wanted to take some
time to update the wider community about where Swift is.
Swift 1.4.8 was included with the last OpenStack realease
Make sure that the endpoint stored in keystone is returning the right
hostname/domain name and port (8080 based on your config).
--John
On Aug 11, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Miguel Alejandro González maggo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
I have 3 nodes with ubuntu 12.04 server and installed openstack
In a standard swift deployment, the proxy server is running behind a load
balancer and/or an SSL terminator. At SwiftStack, we discovered an issue that
may arise from some config parameters in this layer, and we'd like to share it
with other swift deployers.
Symptom:
Users updating metadata
I'm happy to announce that Swift 1.6.0 has been released. You can get the
tarball at https://launchpad.net/swift/folsom/1.6.0. As always, you can upgrade
your production Swift clusters to this new version with no downtime to your
clients.
The complete changelog for this release is at
The next swift release is scheduled for public release next Monday (July 30).
That means we've got a little bit of work to do this week to get it ready.
In order to allow Cloud Files QA time to check it, we need to have packages
built by the middle of the day Wednesday. This means all
Nexenta's LFS patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/7524/) has languished for
a while, and I'd like to address that.
First, thank you for your patch submission. This patch adds new functionality
that potentially can allow swift to be deployed in more places. The original
version of the
statsd integration was added in swift 1.5.0
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Leandro Reox wrote:
On swift essex stable 1.4.8, is the capacity to send statistics to a statsd
server available? Its not in the docs
Regards
___
Mailing list:
I hope you are able to get an answer. I'm traveling this week, so I won't have
a chance to look in to it. I hope some of the other core devs will have a
chance to help you find an answer.
--John
On Jul 1, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all ,
I did several
The probe tests are internal whole-system type of tests that test functionality
never exposed through normal integration testing. They exist at the level
between unit tests and functional tests. For example, one of the probetests
makes sure that asynchronous container updates actually happen.
Yes, this could be good for swift.
ACLs in swift do need to be stored in swift (for scale reasons), but their
implementation is dependent on the particular auth system that you are using.
The auth middleware is responsible for determining if a request is granted
access to a particular swift
On Jun 20, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Victor Rodionov wrote:
Also, I want ask do you think it's good idea to store object ACL in object
metadata?
I'd suggest looking at container-level ACLs rather than object-level. But
either way, the data does need to be stored in the metadata in swift itself.
It looks like Florian (at Rackspace) is working on that blueprint. He just
assigned it to himself.
I'm happy to hear that you have some extra devs for swift work. I'd love to
help coordinate some swift goals with you.
Off the top of my head, here are a few things that could be worked on:
1)
On May 14, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hello everyone,
Currently the bug triaging rights for a given PROJECT (ability to set
status and importance of bugs, but also ability to nominate a bug for a
past series) is restricted to the corresponding PROJECT-bugs team, which
is
TL;DR: removing code from swift, associated projects doc, swift 1.5.0
I want to let the openstack community know of some recent changes within swift
and how those changes will affect the next version of swift. Swift has a
growing developer community and a rapidly expanding deployed base. While
On May 3, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
The term recommended comes with a lot of baggage :) I don't want plugins to
be recommended or suggested -- at least by the community; companies should
feel free to recommend or suggest whatever they feel is best for their distro
or deployment.
On your proxy server, use swift-get-nodes to see which servers your object is
on. With no arguments or --help you will get usage info.
--John
On May 2, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
cc'ing openstack list
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com
I like what you are trying to do here. Can you please submit this as a patch
through gerrit so we can get the rest of the core devs to look at it?
--John
On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote:
There are many place in Swift code where used hard coded values, such
as response
Swift keeps total bytes, container, and object count (eventually) up-to-date in
the account metadata. There are also log processing tools (like slogging -
http://github.com/notmyname/slogging) that can provide usage information
(including bandwidth) based on swift logs.
While I think that it's
I should also mention the summit session talking about this very topic led by
Everett Toews. It's (currently) scheduled for 9am on wednesday.
http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/81
--John
On Apr 12, 2012, at 8:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
Swift keeps total bytes, container
Generally, you would introduce latency in the storage system by using a NAS
attached to a storage drive. Also, at scale, your costs will be dominated by
drive, so you will want to optimize the storage nodes for dense, cheap storage.
--John
On Mar 16, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Michaël Van de Borne
On Mar 10, 2012, at 5:58 AM, John Leach wrote:
I think what I need here is hierarchical zones - I'd define one parent
zone per data-centre, and then multiple child zones within each
(representing racks or whatever).
Swift would be configured to write 3 replicas in 3 child zones, aiming
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Dmitry Ukov wrote:
Hi all,
I want to introduce some ideas about Swift.
Let’s assume we have huge amount of data stored in Swift (e.g. 10Pb). This
data are dynamically changed by users. So we need to reduce network load
caused by replication and intensive
The final swift release for openstack essex is coming quickly. Swift 1.4.8 is
tentatively scheduled for March 22nd. To get your patches into this release,
please submit them for review by next week so we have enough time to review and
QA them.
--John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
a 507 response means that the drive was unmounted. If you are running this in a
VM (like the SAIO), then you need to disable to mount check. Docs for this are
in the SAIO docs.
--John
On Feb 24, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a custom swift server in a
Stefano has asked that swift start keeping email addresses in our AUTHORS file.
I'll be adding these soon, but some contributors have more than one email. If
you have a particular email address you'd like to have me add to your name,
please let me know. Otherwise, I will use one from git log.
It all depends on the auth system you are using.
Below is for swauth and tempauth:
Are the users using the same shared storage? If so, set them up as .admin users
with the same storage endpoint. If they are not using the same shared storage,
then you may be stuck. The ACL support in swauth and
That's great. Have you by any chance seen
https://github.com/pandemicsyn/swift-informant? It's something similar that
we've been playing with at Rackspace.
--John
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Jasper Capel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm announcing a piece of Swift middleware, swprobe [1], designed
On Feb 13, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
What do you think if we :
- split swift.common.client to its own.
- have bin/swift import that package and shipped with it.
- have a comprehensive test suite covering the CLI and the library.
- have some proper PIP release for all
On Feb 11, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Jorge Luiz Corrêa wrote:
2) About Swift, how do I determine the total usable storage capacity of the
system? For example: I have 3 nodes with 5 HDs of 1 TB each one. Straightly I
have 15 TB of space. If I use raid 1 I can say that I'm going to have 7,5 TB
of
I'm happy to announce that swift 1.4.6 has been released today. We've added
some great new features in this release and fixed several outstanding bugs. The
full changelog is below, but I'd like to highlight a few key points.
Swift 1.4.6 includes new middleware that adds the ability to upload
On Jan 24, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Matthew Wodrich wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to write some scripts to work with Swift containers, but I don't
actually know what the restrictions on container names are. Does anyone know
what the specification is, or where I can read up on it?
For example:
That functionality is left up to a client. For example, you could use FUSE to
spoof swift as a filesystem or you could use a client like Cyberduck or even
write your own. Last week someone on this mailing list talked about adding
webDAV support to swift.
All of these work in that they present
The storage volumes referenced in the ring are identified by an IP, port, and
mount point. So, it is possible to use network attached storage for swift (as
long as it still supports xattrs). However, I don't know if this has ever
really been tried (especially in production), and I'd be
look in syslog on your proxy server to see what caused the error.
--John
On Jan 19, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Khaled Ben Bahri wrote:
Hi all,
I tryed to install OpenStack swift,
after creating and configuring all nodes, when i want to check that swift
works,
I execute this command :
swift
more exciting things to
come before our final essex release is made. As always, patches welcome!
John Dickinson
Swift Project Technical Lead
notmyname on IRC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
https://rackspace.echosign.com/verifier
On Jan 9, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 10:02 -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
This change is in place; membership in openstack-cla is required in
order to submit changes to Gerrit.
All of the -core groups have
The best, technical description of the ring was written by the person who had
the biggest role in writing it for swift:
http://www.tlohg.com/p/building-consistent-hashing-ring.html
--John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
It's time again for a swift release. We have cut the swift 1.4.5 release and
it's headed to QA. We expect it to be validated by the end of this week and it
should land for public use early next week.
Below is the changelog for this release. The highlights are the swift-orphans
and swift-oldies
Answers inline.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Alejandro Comisario wrote:
So, lets get down to business.
# 1 we have memcache service running on each proxy, so as far as we know,
memcache actually caches keystone tokens and object paths as the request (
PUT , GET) enters the proxy, but
Overall, I think it's a great thing to have commonality between the projects on
option names and environment variables. I think it's worthwhile to push for
that in the swift cli tool in the essex timeframe.
On the topic of common config libraries, though, I think the differences are
less
I suspect there is a communication gap somewhere, but this is certainly not the
case. Openstack Object Storage (swift) is not deprecated. Glance provides a
bridge between nova and swift, but all three are important, active projects.
Sudhaker,
I know that rpms exist for swift, but I don't know
Updating existing container metadata with a POST is entirely supported and
intended behavior. (The same also applies to adding/updating metadata on an
account.)
--John
On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:10 PM, easco wrote:
Anne,
Thank you for your help, and you're correct, that is the case I am
Awesome. Thanks for putting this together. I know a lot of people have been
interested in getting swift running on non-ubuntu systems. Thanks for sharing
this with everyone.
--John
On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:00 AM, pf shineyear wrote:
openstack swift install on centos 6
1. proxy install
On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
With solution (2), if you look at the issue from Gerrit, GitHub,
Launchpad or Jenkins, those will be separate projects though. The fact
that they share the same PTL is not enough to make them one. For
example, they will have separate bug
In general, I support the idea of good, supported client libraries. I have a
few questions about this particular proposal.
1) Would a distinct python client (and the associated project) be required for
each core openstack project that exposes an API?
2) Why does the PPB need to vote? Actually,
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
2) Why does the PPB need to vote? Actually, what would the PPB be
voting on (assuming the answer to #1 is no)?
Well, it would be effectively promoting several existing projects which
are managed in a few different places (rackspace, 4P, etc)
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
2) Why does the PPB need to vote? Actually, what would the PPB be
voting on (assuming the answer to #1 is no)?
Well, it would be effectively promoting several existing projects which
are managed in a few different places (rackspace, 4P, etc)
I am concerned about some of the implications that are being discussed.
1) A WADL is part of documentation of an API. Nobody is going to object to more
documentation.
2) Being an open-source project, if somebody wants to commit to creating and
maintaining a WADL for a particular part of
On Oct 28, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Swift had the advantage of starting out as a closed source project that
only had to serve a single master, and thus didn't need external
orchestration to keep it on track. Nova, OTOH, as a community development
effort, essentially had to
I'd much prefer storing data in git config rather than in a dot file.
On Oct 14, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14 2011, James E. Blair wrote:
Another idea though is to add a small dotfile into each repository
indicating the canonical location of that repo's gerrit.
, at 8:04 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14 2011, John Dickinson wrote:
I'd much prefer storing data in git config rather than in a dot file.
A dot file is commit-able. Git config is not.
So in this case, providing the dot file wins. Think about like a
.gitignore file.
--
Julien
Jesse Andrews (anotherjesse)(Rackspace)
Jonathan Bryce (jbryce)(Rackspace)
Devin Carlen (devcamcar)(Nebula)
Thierry Carrez (ttx)(Rackspace)
John Dickinson (notmyname)(Rackspace))
Vish Ishaya (vishy)(Rackspace)
Josh Kearney (jk0)(Rackspace)
Joshua McKenty (jmckenty)(Piston)
Ewan Mellor
/9ab33970b58b8219245bfd89e2ad9442c0e94f17)
$ git log -n1 9ab33970b58b8219245bfd89e2ad9442c0e94f17
commit 9ab33970b58b8219245bfd89e2ad9442c0e94f17
Merge: 8526098 c4f0b55
Author: John Dickinson
john.dickin...@rackspace.commailto:john.dickin...@rackspace.com
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:37:02 2011 +
clarification: 5.5PB
On Sep 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
In case you missed it, SDSC is hosting a commercial 55 petabyte storage cloud
using Swift:
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2011/09/supercomputing-center-targets-55-petabyte-storage-at-academics-students.ars
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
