On 2013-05-17 17:54:02 +0800 (+0800), Lei Zhang wrote:
> I type a wrong username by mistake. Does anybody know how to
> reset the Username?
It's something I or one of the other Gerrit admins have to change
manually, and current versions of Gerrit do not provide a way for a
user to change their use
Hi all,
I type a wrong username by mistake. Does anybody know how to reset the
Username?
--
Lei Zhang
Blog: http://jeffrey4l.github.io
twitter/weibo: @jeffrey4l
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad
> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
> gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
> company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.
>
I'm not sure if we support it or not (I don't think we do), but Gerrit
generally works with d
On 2013-04-05 20:18:38 +0100 (+0100), Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'd just fire up a server in the cloud for a couple of minutes,
> that has sshd listening on port 443, that could be used to
> tunnel to gerrit port 22. Cost would be negligible.
Minor correction--while it uses SSH protocol, it's actuall
On 04/04/2013 06:51 PM, Ronak Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
> gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
> company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.
>
> In general, what is the best practice
Thank you all for the reply and I agree on thoughts that we don't have to
change we operate in openstack development. But yes, this particular
requirement MUST be highlighted on the contribution page such that people
can take notice of it.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On
On 04/04/2013 05:31 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-04-04 22:11:10 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
I don't know how hard it would be for OpenStack Infrastructure team
to officially make Gerrit available via port 443, in addition to the
normal SSH port.
We'd need to use differe
On 2013-04-04 22:11:10 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
> I don't know how hard it would be for OpenStack Infrastructure team
> to officially make Gerrit available via port 443, in addition to the
> normal SSH port.
We'd need to use different hostnames mapped to different IP
addresse
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0700, Ronak Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
> gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
> company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.
>
> In general, what is th
+1
Regards,
Pranav
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
> >> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
> >> into the gerrit server, I was wondering if a
On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
>> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
>> into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face
>> problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to exter
On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
> As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
> into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face
> problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external
> hosts.
[...]
It usually involves the uphill
Hi,
As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.
In general, what is the best practice in terms of environment for
generating code review?
I app
Hi all
I tried to search some patches in my own query. And I follow this link:
https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/user-search.html
There's a little mistake on that.
Like the
owner:'USER'
Changes originally submitted by USER.
It should be
owner:"USER"
Changes originally submitted by USER.
Hi folks
I am trying to access openstack gerrit but keep getting permission denied
(publickey).
I have updated my public key multiple times at review.openstack.org and still
get the same error.
I tried the following commands.
git review -s
ssh -vv -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa -p 29418
phani_acha
On 2013-03-06 11:51:26 -0600 (-0600), phani_acha...@dell.com wrote:
> I am trying to access openstack gerrit but keep getting
> permission denied (publickey).
[...]
Phani, I'll follow up with you privately to troubleshoot, but
chances are this is just a username mismatch. I'll
So, I wonder how the OpenStack Gerrit avoids sending these start messages.
Has it been customized?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:28 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Scott Lavender writes:
>
> > Does anyone know how to suppress the build started messages from Jenkins?
> > We have th
Hi Gary,
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:16 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Anyone having problems with gerrit?
I can access it fine and the monitoring system doesn't show anything out
of the ordinary. Can you please be a bit more specific as to the
problem?
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi -
Hi,
Anyone having problems with gerrit?
Thanks
Gary
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
sults of all three. This is a total of 4
> messages. I noticed that the OpenStack Gerrit server only displays the
> final summary message.
>
> Is this a configuration on the Jenkins or Gerrit side of the integration?
> How is this accomplished?
>
> Thanks.
So a while back th
messages. I noticed that the OpenStack Gerrit server only displays the
final summary message.
Is this a configuration on the Jenkins or Gerrit side of the integration?
How is this accomplished?
Thanks.
--
*Scott Lavender | Cloud Release Engineer
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:38 -0400, David Shrewsbury wrote:
> We have upgraded Gerrit to 2.4.1. Let the CI team know if you are
> still experiencing
> any issues with email.
I just commented on a review, then noticed that I had failed to receive
the email letting me know that it had been pushed int
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:24 PM, David Shrewsbury wrote:
>
> This seems to be a bug in 2.4, and fixed in 2.4.1, due to be released soon.
>
We have upgraded Gerrit to 2.4.1. Let the CI team know if you are still
experiencing
any issues with email.
-Dave
_
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell <
kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> For the past few days, I have noticed that I no longer get emails when
> new changes are pushed, when changes I've commented on have new patch
> sets pushed, or when changes I've commented on are finally me
I was wondering the same thing...
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell <
kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> For the past few days, I have noticed that I no longer get emails when
> new changes are pushed, when changes I've commented on have new patch
> sets pushed, or when chang
For the past few days, I have noticed that I no longer get emails when
new changes are pushed, when changes I've commented on have new patch
sets pushed, or when changes I've commented on are finally merged. I do
receive emails when comments are made on changes I've commented on, but
the other ema
https://review.openstack.org/#change,6076 has been open since Apr 2nd.
I understand everyone must have been busy with Essex release up to 5th.
Can someone please take a look and approve ? (It is a trivial change)
Thanks,
-Mandar
___
> there have been occasions where it's frustrated me that something I
> objected to got merged without my seeing it or while I was trying to
> comment.
I've heard of this several times in the past as well - some merge prop is
mid-review, and then it merges. Is there an easy mechanism to flag a r
ebula@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
> Johannes Erdfelt
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:45 PM
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Gerrit minimum review time frame
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
> > As long as we're t
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
> As long as we're talking about review issues, I'd really like to have a
> set of reviewing guidelines. Even better would be to have them in
> checklist form to make sure we don't miss things as we do reviews
> (checklists are great: http://gawande.com
On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Josh Kearney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/3/13 Jesse Andrews :
> > Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
> > complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
> > a second "+2
ce at the summit if there continues to be
disagreement on the subject.
-Alex
-Original Message-
From: "Joe Gordon"
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:59pm
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Gerrit minimum re
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Josh Kearney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>>
>> So I'd rather work on formally splitting the nova-core group into
>> smaller topic-oriented review groups, which would ensure that code
>> affecting a given area is reviewed by th
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
>> I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
>> sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of the time these
>> branches are vetted properly, the window for reviewing can be
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> So I'd rather work on formally splitting the nova-core group into
> smaller topic-oriented review groups, which would ensure that code
> affecting a given area is reviewed by the experts of that area (rather
> than by whoever happens to be o
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/3/13 Jesse Andrews :
> > Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
> > complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
> > a second "+2 / approved" so I can redeploy our test cluster for th
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:57 -0500, Josh Kearney wrote:
> > Is this is really a problem that needs solving? I'd like to believe that no
> > member of Nova Core would approve something that they aren't familiar with.
>
> I think the issue is more a cas
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Gordon"
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:59:02 PM
> Subject: [Openstack] Gerrit minimum review time frame
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved ver
Joe Gordon wrote:
> I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
> sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of the time these
> branches are vetted properly, the window for reviewing can be so small
> that a non-trivial branch lands but without enough vetting. If someo
2012/3/13 John Garbutt :
> One extra concern. Since I work in the UK, most things happen while I
> am sleeping.
>
> Not sure I know of a good solution to that problem. A 12 hour window
> seems stupidly long,
No. No, it doesn't.
--
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Senior Software En
9:37
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Gerrit minimum review time frame
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 12/03/12 21:59, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
> > sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of th
2012/3/13 Jesse Andrews :
> Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
> complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
> a second "+2 / approved" so I can redeploy our test cluster for the
> last 2 hours.
Can we keep this discussion separate, please
Hi Joe,
On 12/03/12 21:59, Joe Gordon wrote:
> I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
> sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of the time these
> branches are vetted properly, the window for reviewing can be so small
> that a non-trivial branch lands but witho
Obviously, a better review algorithm is required,
To avoid hungry condition of some branches.
Now the whole system feels more like a client/server model.
Maybe a peer to peer like model behaves better.
在 2012-3-13，15:13，"Jesse Andrews" 写道：
> Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take
2012/3/12 Josh Kearney :
> Is this is really a problem that needs solving? I'd like to believe
> that no member of Nova Core would approve something that they aren't
> familiar with.
That's not the point. The review process isn't just about finding enough
people who agree with your change, it's ju
Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
a second "+2 / approved" so I can redeploy our test cluster for the
last 2 hours.
When lots of people are active, reviews can be approved in quickly -
especiall
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:57 -0500, Josh Kearney wrote:
> Is this is really a problem that needs solving? I'd like to believe that no
> member of Nova Core would approve something that they aren't familiar with.
I think the issue is more a case of allowing some time for other
reviewers to come alon
Is this is really a problem that needs solving? I'd like to believe that no
member of Nova Core would approve something that they aren't familiar with.
IMHO, we should be making better attempts at not letting branches sit
around for days/weeks at a time.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Joe Gordo
Hi All,
I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of the time these branches
are vetted properly, the window for reviewing can be so small that a
non-trivial branch lands but without enough vetting. If someone is in a
meetin
This may help you. If you are not in the CLA group you cannot connect to gerrit
for the git-review.
This blog may help ya out as well.
http://blog.doughellmann.com/2012/03/preparing-my-first-patch-for-openstack.html
Sign the CLA: Every developer needs to sign the Individual Contributor Licens
Can someone help me? I think my gerrit account is boned.
redbo@ubuntu:~/swift$ git review
fatal: A Contributor Agreement must be completed before uploading:
http://wiki.openstack.org/HowToContribute
-- Mike
___
Mailing list: https://la
Ah right.
On Feb 16, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> As I mentioned offline, the issue is that git-review automatically rebases,
> so if there has been a merge in between it will rebase and upload a new patch
> set. If you use git-review -R it will leave the old patch set, at the
As I mentioned offline, the issue is that git-review automatically rebases, so
if there has been a merge in between it will rebase and upload a new patch set.
If you use git-review -R it will leave the old patch set, at the risk of not
catching a possible conflict when you upload.
Vish
On Feb
Hm. It shouldn't have uploaded a new patch set for 3990 if you did not modify
the commit in 3990.
However, it does appear that you modified 3990's commit. This method was added:
test_get_rrd_server()
in nova/tests/test_xenapi.py
You can see it here:
https://review.openstack.org/#patch,unifi
Hello,
What is the right way to base a change on another uncommitted change?
For example, I have https://review.openstack.org/#change,4267 based on top of
https://review.openstack.org/#change,3990. I checked out 3990. Created a topic
branch with "git checkout -b name". I committed my own chang
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Monty and I have been working on a solution to a number of problems
> and suggested enhancements to Gerrit. In short, we're planning on
> adding a new review type to Gerrit so that a core reviewer can
> specifically mark a review as "Approved
Fantastic! I've been tired of having to look up people to see what their
vote counted as. It's gotten hard to keep track of everyone.
-tr3buchet
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> James E. Blair wrote:
> > Monty and I have been working on a solution to a number of problems
James E. Blair wrote:
> Monty and I have been working on a solution to a number of problems
> and suggested enhancements to Gerrit. In short, we're planning on
> adding a new review type to Gerrit so that a core reviewer can
> specifically mark a review as "Approved" for Jenkins to test and
> merg
Hi,
Monty and I have been working on a solution to a number of problems
and suggested enhancements to Gerrit. In short, we're planning on
adding a new review type to Gerrit so that a core reviewer can
specifically mark a review as "Approved" for Jenkins to test and
merge. This will end our overl
Yuriy Taraday writes:
> Hello.
>
> So, I'm still trying to understand how to work with Gerrit.
> I've uploaded series of commits to Gerrit. One of them is
> https://review.openstack.org/159. Patchset has been changed several times
> then merged then reverted, but change is still in Merged status.
Hello.
So, I'm still trying to understand how to work with Gerrit.
I've uploaded series of commits to Gerrit. One of them is
https://review.openstack.org/159. Patchset has been changed several times
then merged then reverted, but change is still in Merged status. Who should
set it to any other sta
Yuriy Taraday writes:
> I have series of commits that can be applied separately and can be treated
> as separate improvements in my branch.
> That commits were there before I knew that I should install Gerrit hook.
> Now I have bunch of commits without Change-Id while commit --amend works
> only
I have series of commits that can be applied separately and can be treated
as separate improvements in my branch.
That commits were there before I knew that I should install Gerrit hook.
Now I have bunch of commits without Change-Id while commit --amend works
only with the last one. How can I edit
I'm not sure about during an interactive rebase .. I've always just
done the amend before or after the rebase and the changeid will get
added if it isn't already there.
Thanks,
Brad
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Trey Morris wrote:
> I had to register my git email with gerrit as well, no proble
I had to register my git email with gerrit as well, no problems after.
If you do a "git commit --amend" will the hook add the change-id after you
edit the commit message? I ask because it didn't when doing an interactive
rebase. I did it this morning but I pasted the change-id in myself.
-trey
O
If your commit doesn't have a change-id message you can add one by
amending the commit (git commit --amend) as long as you have the
commit-msg hook in place and executable. (See here for more details:
http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow) This page doesn't mention
it but you need to chmod +x t
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes:
> I'll work on updating our import script to fix the rest of the
> accounts and send out another email to this list when that is
> complete.
Monty has fixed the Launchpad sync script so that publicly available
emails should correctly show up in Gerrit
Yuriy Taraday writes:
> Thanks to he fix, "invalid author" problem vanished.
> Now I'm getting "missing Change-Id in commit message" error.
> What is the best way to provide Change-Id to existing commits?
>
> Kind regards, Yuriy.
We've seen two ways of getting commits without Change-Ids from
rep
Thanks to he fix, "invalid author" problem vanished.
Now I'm getting "missing Change-Id in commit message" error.
What is the best way to provide Change-Id to existing commits?
Kind regards, Yuriy.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 18:58, James E. Blair wrote:
> Yuriy Taraday writes:
>
> > Hello.
> >
>
Yuriy Taraday writes:
> Hello.
>
> I'm trying to use Gerrit to propose changes to Keystone.
> I'm using instructions from http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow to push
> my changes.
> I'm getting "invalid author" error but my settings/contacts page looks fine
> and the e-mail listed there and
on behalf
of Yuriy Taraday [yorik@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:50 AM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] [Gerrit] Getting "invalid author"
Hello.
I'm trying to use Gerrit to propose changes to Keystone.
I'm using instructions from htt
Hello.
I'm trying to use Gerrit to propose changes to Keystone.
I'm using instructions from http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow to push
my changes.
I'm getting "invalid author" error but my settings/contacts page looks fine
and the e-mail listed there and in the error message are the same.
Wh
72 matches
Mail list logo
