Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-28 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:52:36 + Ziad Sawalha wrote: > Hi Pete - the brackets were a mistake in the documentation. The correct > syntax is %tenant_id%. Thanks, makes sense. I saw your commit just now, too. I'm still unable to coax Keystone into giving me X-Storage-Url:, so if I run swift CLI,

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-26 Thread Leandro Reox
Thanks a lot ziad we noticed the global way of.endponting and the private with association per tenant. Having detailed docs its always really helpfull. Integration between keystone and the other components are not well documented, we foght a lot with nova and keystone broken packages ended up cloni

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-26 Thread Ziad Sawalha
Hi Pete - the brackets were a mistake in the documentation. The correct syntax is %tenant_id%. Z On 11/25/11 5:00 PM, "Pete Zaitcev" wrote: >On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:28:01 -0300 >Leandro Reox wrote: > >> keystone-manage endpointTemplates add RegionOne swift >> http://172.16.0.88:8080/v1/AUTH_%te

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-26 Thread Kuo Hugo
Thanks Chmouel , a type :> I do mean v2.0 2011/11/26 Chmouel Boudjnah > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Kuo Hugo wrote: > > For Swift API v1.0 + keystone ... an User could only access one tenant.. > > But in Swift API v1.0 + keystone your can access different tenants > via >

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Kuo Hugo wrote: > For Swift API v1.0 + keystone ... an User could only access one  tenant.. > But in Swift API v1.0 + keystone your can access different tenants via ^^^ I guess you mean 2.0 and not 1.0 here. > "-U %tenant%:%USER%:

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-25 Thread Kuo Hugo
2011/11/26 Pete Zaitcev > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:28:01 -0300 > Leandro Reox wrote: > > > keystone-manage endpointTemplates add RegionOne swift > > http://172.16.0.88:8080/v1/AUTH_%tenant_id% http://172.16.0.88:8080/ > > http://172.16.0.88:8080/v1/AUTH_%tenant_id% 1 1 > > I'm curious, did you act

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-25 Thread Dolph Mathews
In keystone endpoint templates, the appropriate syntax is to use is %tenant_id%, which keystone then substitutes with actual tenant ID's. Which documentation are you referring to (doc/configuration.rst)? -Dolph On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:28:01

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-25 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:28:01 -0300 Leandro Reox wrote: > keystone-manage endpointTemplates add RegionOne swift > http://172.16.0.88:8080/v1/AUTH_%tenant_id% http://172.16.0.88:8080/ > http://172.16.0.88:8080/v1/AUTH_%tenant_id% 1 1 I'm curious, did you actually put the '%' (percent) into those U

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-24 Thread Leandro Reox
Ok, solved !!! was an issue on the Storage nodes, the path /srv/node was not found so the sda6 was returning "unmounted" ... actually weird the way that is presented to the user Regards On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Marcelo Martins wrote: > Hi Leandro, > > > If you search all swift services l

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Marcelo Martins
Hi Leandro, If you search all swift services logs for the transaction Id returned what do you see ? Marcelo Martins Openstack-swift btorch...@zeroaccess.org “Knowledge is the wings on which our aspirations take flight and soar. When it comes to surfing and life if you know what to do yo

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Kuo Hugo
Need more informations . Maybe you can check the log of keystone , verifying where's the 404 come from If keystone log tell you that it already return 200 to swift . I think the 404 is returned from swift. the 404 bad request , should be log in proxy log and keystone log. -- +Hugo Kuo

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Leandro Reox
Im getting 404 with both tools, curl and swift , we're using the repo where you commited 41 minutes ago Regards On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Hi, > > Which version did you use for keystone2 from cloudbuilders github > trunk? can you try again (I just updated some f

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hi, Which version did you use for keystone2 from cloudbuilders github trunk? can you try again (I just updated some fixes to it just now). And what do you mean you are getting 404, how do you test it ? with swift cli or via curl ? Chmouel. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Leandro Reox wrote:

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Leandro Reox
Hi Hugo, We changed out everything to keystone2 , now we're getting a 404 when we try to create the container, maybe the account autocreation is not working properly any thoughts ? Regards On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Kuo Hugo wrote: > Hi Leandro , > > Post on launchpad QA will be a bette

Re: [Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Kuo Hugo
Hi Leandro , Post on launchpad QA will be a better place though. Plz post it on launchpad , and we will jump to there for further discussion. 1. Verify that your keystone is running , via curl -v -H "X-Auth-User: MAX" -H "X-Auth-Key: Infa" http://%keystone_IP%:5000/v1.0 If keystone working prope

[Openstack] Keystone + Swift integration

2011-11-23 Thread Leandro Reox
Hi guys, Anyone has a working proxy-server.conf and endpoint templates for swift, we're trying to integrate them but we always face a different error. We're using keystone from the Cloudbuilders repo and Swift release 1.4.3 . When we test our environment all the POST and GETs via swift tool or CU

[Openstack] Keystone / Swift integration

2011-09-08 Thread Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services)
Hello, can anyone comment on the status of the Keystone auth middle-ware component for Swift? When can we expect ACL support included? Will we have swauth comparable functionality by the time Diablo releases? Thanks, Jason smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _