I'm about to install OpenStack for a customer in a few days. It's an SME
and their first production cloud would be limited to a few hosts and
about 60 VMs. Do you feel it'd be worth getting their feedback about
deployment and usage?
yours,
michaël
Michaël Van de Borne
RD Engineer, SOA
Hey Guys
One of the user stories from my company. We are an SME and our customers
are SMEs too. We are working on releasing documents in detail as well as
discussing with the customers, for releasing the entire customizations to
the community. We are working on releasing all these in the form of
+1 well said
Saurabh saur...@safewlabs.com wrote:
Hey Guys
One of the user stories from my company. We are an SME and our customers are
SMEs too. We are working on releasing documents in detail as well as discussing
with the customers, for releasing the entire customizations to the
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
+1 well said
Saurabh saur...@safewlabs.com wrote:
Hey Guys
One of the user stories from my company. We are an SME and our customers are
SMEs too. We are working on releasing documents in detail as well as discussing
with the customers, for releasing
...@safewlabs.commailto:saur...@safewlabs.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
+2 , I go with Saurabh.
Thanks
Meena Raja
From:
openstack-bounces+raja.meena=wipro@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack-bounces
@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
+2 , I go with Saurabh.
Thanks
Meena Raja
From:
openstack-bounces+raja.meena=wipro@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack-bounces+raja.meena=wipro@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+raja.meena
...@safewlabs.commailto:saur...@safewlabs.com Cc:
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
+2 , I go with Saurabh.
Thanks
Meena Raja
From:
openstack-bounces+raja.meena=wipro@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack-bounces+raja.meena
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 17:28 -0700, Michael March wrote:
Pretty much everyone featured on that page are 'big' organizations and
there really isn't any detail on their experiences of trying to deploy
(and maintain) Openstack. There's definitely not stories that a
mid-range sized IT shop could
:41 +
To: Mark Collier
mark.coll...@rackspace.commailto:mark.coll...@rackspace.com,
saur...@safewlabs.commailto:saur...@safewlabs.com Cc:
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
+2 , I go with Saurabh.
Thanks
Michael, were not IBM or Dell, were not as big as you think. Were just 4
guys that deployed and mantain our openstack private cloud. Yes just four
guys. Were always present at the summits or cons answering questions and
telling people how hard was moving into iaas how many time it takes to
deploy
+ ?
On 4/5/12 9:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
On 04/04/2012 04:20 PM, David Kranz wrote:
+1000
I believe the nova team should make backporting essential bugs to a
stable essex base and dealing with the upgrade issue the highest
priority for the start (at least) of the
I've been giving this thread some thought and it dawned on my that we need
to expand this page:
http://openstack.org/user-stories/
Pretty much everyone featured on that page are 'big' organizations and
there really isn't any detail on their experiences of trying to deploy (and
maintain)
Hi everyone,
According to the statement of this article from Gartner group
http://blogs.gartner.com/lydia_leong/2012/04/03/citrix-cloudstack-openstack-and-the-war-for-open-source-clouds/
Openstack is a
highly immature platform.
But why? What's make Openstack so immature?
Any comments on that?
Immaturity of a platform is something you can easily fix paying the right
fee to your favorite analyst firm.
Seriously, Openstack is an open platform and an open community. This means
problems and issues are open to discuss to everyone. Propietary platforms
issues are rarely disclosed, and they
It depends on what you expect OpenStack to do for you. If you want
pre-packaged, click-to-install software, it is not there, yet. But if
you want to be able to influence the future of the project you want to
bet your business on, you have a much higher chance of doing that with
OpenStack than with
I believe this Openstack is a highly immature platform. is referring
more to nova than swift. The simple reason for that is nova is more
focused on dev than ops but that is changing.In mature projects
the questions like How do I run this reliably every day? and How
can I safely upgrade from
The "immaturity" being exposed here has nothing to do with neither stability nor bugs - in fact the angle is more about an ease of deployment.Such statements are not new, and well known from "enterprises" point of view.I remember same articles about Linux, few years back about Zimbra, few months
H. While ease of deployment is definitely an area of future strength for
OS, the gap is closing rapidly and the reality for the enterprise is that
initial, comparable (apples to apples) VMWare installations all come with an
initial professional services engagement anyway.
Having just
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Razique Mahroua
razique.mahr...@gmail.comwrote:
The immaturity being exposed here has nothing to do with neither
stability nor bugs - in fact the angle is more about an ease of deployment.
Such statements are not new, and well known from enterprises point of
According to the statement of this article from Gartner
group http://blogs.gartner.com/lydia_leong/2012/04/03/citrix-cloudstack-openstack-and-the-war-for-open-source-clouds/ Openstack is a
highly immature platform.
But why? What's make Openstack so immature?
Any comments on that?
Thank you
+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jan Drake
Sent: 04 April 2012 16:37
To: Razique Mahroua
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack immaturity
H. While ease of deployment is definitely an area of future strength for
OS, the gap is closing rapidly
There are many projects rolled up into the thing called OpenStack.
Nova is only one of them and is the one that most people are talking
about when they say OpenStack. This does a huge disservice to the
other projects especially Swift.
It's very frustrating to see the other projects all painted
+1000
I believe the nova team should make backporting essential bugs to a
stable essex base and dealing with the upgrade issue the highest
priority for the start (at least) of the Folsom cycle. We need people to
deploy real systems using Essex. With regard to smooth upgrades, they
won't
Maybe it would be more interesting, instead of getting on the defensive to
instead start asking what people think is broken or is immature and fix those
areas.
Push forward, get peoples feelings about it, and take it as constructive input.
If people think its immature, ask for why and then fix
Another perspective worth considering is immaturity vs growth. Are
there enough progresses being made? When problems are identified, are
these solved swiftly and effectively? I think the people involved in
the OpenStack community do and have done a great job in this regard,
and should be praised
25 matches
Mail list logo
