On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:36:58AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Cool,
>
> Maybe I can get a branch out there that u can start hooking in by early feb.
>
> That would seem like a good use of time :-)
Great, sounds like a good plan.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flick
Cool,
Maybe I can get a branch out there that u can start hooking in by early feb.
That would seem like a good use of time :-)
On 1/6/12 3:21 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:33:00AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Hmmm, so the RNG schemas aren't stable? Is that basical
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:33:00AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Hmmm, so the RNG schemas aren't stable? Is that basically
> the problem there (or part of it)? That seems not so good,
> since I thought the whole point of publishing schemas was
> for people to use them, darn :(
Well there are two d
Hmmm, so the RNG schemas aren't stable? Is that basically the problem there (or
part of it)? That seems not so good, since I thought the whole point of
publishing schemas was for people to use them, darn :(
This libvirt-gconfig does sound good though, is there anyway we can get the
dependencies
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:17:45AM -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> I was wondering if there has been any thought or consideration of removing
> tempita and replacing it with "just python".
> Personally the current tempita usage (libvirt.xml.template) seems to be
> heading down a hairy path and I wa
Cool, does anyone have a good recommendation for the "best" xsd to python?
Actually that looks like releax NG.
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=tree;f=docs/schemas;h=5085252d9917c216eb45305d9204c56bccf91551;hb=HEAD
Seeing that I haven't had experience with this anyone have any good prior
ex
Fwiw, I'm +1 on this :-)
I look forward to reviewing the branch...
d
On 04 Jan 2012 - 14:51, Jay Pipes wrote:
> No argument from me. Feel free to propose a branch that does the
> things you describe below. I'm sure you'll get feedback in code review
> :)
>
> Cheers!
> -jay
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 201
No argument from me. Feel free to propose a branch that does the
things you describe below. I'm sure you'll get feedback in code review
:)
Cheers!
-jay
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> I was wondering if there has been any thought or consideration of removing
> tempita and
I was wondering if there has been any thought or consideration of removing
tempita and replacing it with "just python".
Personally the current tempita usage (libvirt.xml.template) seems to be heading
down a hairy path and I wanted to see others opinions on say replacing this
with something that
9 matches
Mail list logo
