Thanks for the elaboration, Adam, appreciated. :)
Best,
-jay
On 06/04/2012 12:16 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 06/04/2012 09:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/30/2012 09:28 PM, Adam Young wrote:
The recent discussion about node.js made me rethink the state of
Websocket support for Apache and Openstack
unchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Adam Young
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 9:17 AM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Websocket support long term
On 06/04/2012 09:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/30/2012 09:28 PM, Adam Young wrote:
The recent discussion about node.js made me rethink the s
t; bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
> Adam Young
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 9:17 AM
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Websocket support long term
>
> On 06/04/2012 09:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > On 05/30/201
On 06/04/2012 09:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/30/2012 09:28 PM, Adam Young wrote:
The recent discussion about node.js made me rethink the state of
Websocket support for Apache and Openstack. A quick recap:
1) neither mod_wsgi nor mod_proxy support Web sockets.
2) There is a Websocket Module fo
On 05/30/2012 09:28 PM, Adam Young wrote:
The recent discussion about node.js made me rethink the state of
Websocket support for Apache and Openstack. A quick recap:
1) neither mod_wsgi nor mod_proxy support Web sockets.
2) There is a Websocket Module for Apache, but using it requires an
additio
The recent discussion about node.js made me rethink the state of
Websocket support for Apache and Openstack. A quick recap:
1) neither mod_wsgi nor mod_proxy support Web sockets.
2) There is a Websocket Module for Apache, but using it requires an
additional apache module.
3) There is websoc
6 matches
Mail list logo
