It has been a pretty long month. I absorbed the community's comments, made
improvements where they've been raised, and have also refactored to
use fully asynchronous messaging.
I won't say the driver isn't without bugs, but it is again fully-functional and
feature complete. I've been working
The ZeroMQ RPC driver is now feature-complete. I'm cleaning up for a
merge-proposal!
--
Eric Windisch___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More
2012 22:17
To: Alexis Richardson
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] ZeroMQ RPC Driver - FF-Exception request
Sorry to bring back a rather quiet thread from 3 days ago.
How fast do we need to queueing component to be? My observation from
Amazon EC2 us-east-1 is about 2 VMs
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Rosa, Andrea andrea.r...@hp.com wrote:
Hi
In my opinion there is another point to consider: at this moment it's
possible, in rabbitmq by auth-mechanism-ssl plugin, to use client and
server authentication through certificates.
I don't know 0MQ, so maybe the
Sorry to bring back a rather quiet thread from 3 days ago.
How fast do we need to queueing component to be? My observation from
Amazon EC2 us-east-1 is about 2 VMs provisioned per second on average.
Let's say there are 100 messages exchanged for the workload per second
per VM (which I believe is
Duncan McGreggor wrote:
FWIW, I'd love to see this land in E3...
It won't land in E3, but can still be in Essex.
In particular if it's just an alternate code path that doesn't affect
existing code, it's a good candidate for FFe and landing early E4.
Cheers,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release
Alexis,
It is also obvious that the link I provided is a particularly biased source, so
it should be taken with a grain of salt. I only mentioned Qpid because Nova
just received a driver for it, I didn't know the differences in such detail.
One of the problems Nova has is that it registers N
Per today's meeting, I am proposing the ZeroMQ RPC driver for a feature-freeze
exception.
I am making good progress on this blueprint, it adds a new optional module and
service without modifying any existing code or modules. I have been pushing to
complete this work by E3, so I am close to
FWIW, I'd love to see this land in E3...
d
On 24 Jan 2012 - 16:08, Eric Windisch wrote:
Per today's meeting, I am proposing the ZeroMQ RPC driver for a
feature-freeze exception.
I am making good progress on this blueprint, it adds a new optional
module and service without modifying any
Hi I'm curious and unfamiliar with the subject. What's the benefit of
0MQ vs Kombu? Thanks,
Yun
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.com wrote:
Per today's meeting, I am proposing the ZeroMQ RPC driver for a
feature-freeze exception.
I am making good progress on
Under specific architectures, 0MQ can process millions of messages per
second vs. RabbitMQ's many thousands.
RabbitMQ is a messaging system; 0MQ is a messaging framework. There's a
pretty good write-up on some of the basic differences here:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:welcome-from-amqp
Note
I assume the messages will be delivered directly to the destination rather
than piling up on a queue server?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Duncan McGreggor dun...@dreamhost.comwrote:
Under specific architectures, 0MQ can process millions of messages per
second vs. RabbitMQ's many
Sorry, I had originally sent only to Yun Mao. Sending to list.
---
Rather than attempt to answer this, I defer to the ZeroMQ guide. It should be
noted that the designers of AMPQ, iMatix, designed and build ZeroMQ. (RabbitMQ
and QUID implement AMQP)
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Zhongyue Luo wrote:
I assume the messages will be delivered directly to the destination rather
than piling up on a queue server?
Although the blueprint doesn't specify this level of detail, the intention had
originally been to deliver a
14 matches
Mail list logo
